Re: [Freesurfer] High resolution fMRI and resolution of anatomical scans

2013-02-25 Thread Douglas N Greve
yes On 02/25/2013 03:23 PM, sha...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu wrote: > We always collect a low resolution whole brain mprage structural scan > before the functional scans to help us position our slices. Can I use > that? > >> You do not need another one unless you think that the brain has changed >> in so

Re: [Freesurfer] High resolution fMRI and resolution of anatomical scans

2013-02-25 Thread shahin
We always collect a low resolution whole brain mprage structural scan before the functional scans to help us position our slices. Can I use that? > > You do not need another one unless you think that the brain has changed > in some way between when you collected the anat and the func. Also, if > y

Re: [Freesurfer] High resolution fMRI and resolution of anatomical scans

2013-02-25 Thread Douglas N Greve
You do not need another one unless you think that the brain has changed in some way between when you collected the anat and the func. Also, if you are going to acquire a partial field of view (ie, only part of the brain), make sure you get a full brain acq of something to help in registration

Re: [Freesurfer] High resolution fMRI and resolution of anatomical scans

2013-02-25 Thread Matt Glasser
I'd collect highres T1w as well and then refine the 1mm surfaces using that. Peace, Matt. From: SHAHIN NASR Date: Monday, February 25, 2013 1:39 PM To: Freesurfer , Bruce Fischl , Doug Greve Subject: [Freesurfer] High resolution fMRI and resolution of anatomical scans Hi, W

[Freesurfer] High resolution fMRI and resolution of anatomical scans

2013-02-25 Thread SHAHIN NASR
Hi, We are planning to collect high resolution *functional* MRI for a group of subjects with voxel size smaller than 1 mm. For these subjects, we already have reconstructed *anatomical *scans with 1 mm voxel size. The question is, do we need to re-collect *anatomical* scans for these subjects w