Re: [Freesurfer] Mean thickness estimation {Disarmed}

2020-11-20 Thread Fischl, Bruce
nmovie_qt) Cheers Bruce From: freesurfer-boun...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu On Behalf Of Stephanie K Sent: Friday, November 20, 2020 6:25 AM To: Freesurfer support list Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] Mean thickness estimation {Disarmed} External Email - Use Caution Hi Bruce, No, I don’t think that

Re: [Freesurfer] Mean thickness estimation {Disarmed}

2020-11-20 Thread Stephanie K
t; Cheers > > Bruce > > > > *From:* freesurfer-boun...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu < > freesurfer-boun...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu> *On Behalf Of *Stephanie K > *Sent:* Thursday, November 19, 2020 4:19 PM > *To:* Freesurfer support list > *Subject:* Re: [Freesurfer] Mean thicknes

Re: [Freesurfer] Mean thickness estimation {Disarmed}

2020-11-19 Thread Fischl, Bruce
, 2020 4:19 PM To: Freesurfer support list Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] Mean thickness estimation {Disarmed} External Email - Use Caution Hi Bruce, Is it also necessary to remove outliers (eg. 3 SD from the mean) for Freesurfer structural measures of MRI images that have been visually

Re: [Freesurfer] Mean thickness estimation {Disarmed}

2020-11-19 Thread Stephanie K
External Email - Use Caution Hi Bruce, Is it also necessary to remove outliers (eg. 3 SD from the mean) for Freesurfer structural measures of MRI images that have been visually inspected as a further data cleaning step? I really appreciate your help. Thanks On Thu, Nov 19, 202