there a way to get past this error?
-Hedyeh
Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2018 13:20:20 -0400
From: Douglas Greve
Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] Non-rigid registration approaches
To:
Message-ID: <52506cd6-286b-21a0-859a-1cda85557...@mgh.harvard.edu>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Sorr
edyeh
-
Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2018 11:49:04 -0400
From: Douglas Greve <mailto:dgr...@mgh.harvard.edu>>
Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] Non-rigid registration approaches
To: <mailto:freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>>
Mes
-
Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2018 11:49:04 -0400
From: Douglas Greve
Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] Non-rigid registration approaches
To:
Message-ID: <763da2ef-359a-9f44-9b54-1f96acb3b...@mgh.harvard.edu>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Not really. Are you t
Not really. Are you trying to account for B0 distortion in the DTI? If
you have a B0 map, you can pass that to bbregsiter and mri_vol2vol to
account for it
On 4/16/18 10:29 AM, Hedyeh Javaheri wrote:
Hello all,
I am performing DTI analysis and wanted to know if Freesurfer has a
tool for non
Hello all,
I am performing DTI analysis and wanted to know if Freesurfer has a tool
for non-rigid registration.
I performed recon-all and dt_recon on my subject and then used the
register.dat file that was generated by dt_recon to convert the dt_recon
output files back into the space of my orig.ni
It depends on what the reviewer is concerned about. You don't want to
use a fully non-rigid registration because the drop out will look like
the edge of the brain, and the non-rigid will warp it incorrectly. If
he/she is talking about using something more constrained like B0
correction, then i
Hi,
In our functional MRI studies, we co-registration the functional
images to anatomical scans (a part of preproc-sess routine in version 5)
before measuring the contrasts. But for one of our studies, a reviewer has
asked if a “non-rigid image registration” would change results when we are
