Thank you for clarifying this.
Mihaela
On Tue, Nov 25, 2014 at 11:16 PM, Bruce Fischl fis...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
wrote:
No, I don't think so
Bruce
On Nov 25, 2014, at 11:05 PM, Mihaela Stefan mikaelastep...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi Bruce,
I've heard people saying that FS 5.3 is focusing
Hi Mihaela
if you want to upload a representative subject we will take a look
cheers
Bruce
On Tue,
25 Nov 2014, Mihaela Stefan wrote:
Hello Freesurfers,
We noticed that our subcortical segmentations have a poor quality (see
attachment). Is there a way to improve the segmentation in an
Hi Bruce,
I uploaded a subject.
Thanks!
Mihaela
On Tue, Nov 25, 2014 at 10:13 AM, Bruce Fischl fis...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
wrote:
Hi Mihaela
if you want to upload a representative subject we will take a look
cheers
Bruce
On Tue,
25 Nov 2014, Mihaela Stefan wrote:
Hello Freesurfers,
Hi Bruce,
I've heard people saying that FS 5.3 is focusing on better output for
cortical thickness and that I should use 5.0 for subcortical segmentation
because it's better. Does that make sense?
Thanks!
Mihaela
On Tue, Nov 25, 2014 at 10:43 AM, Mihaela Stefan mikaelastep...@gmail.com
wrote:
No, I don't think so
Bruce
On Nov 25, 2014, at 11:05 PM, Mihaela Stefan mikaelastep...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Bruce,
I've heard people saying that FS 5.3 is focusing on better output for
cortical thickness and that I should use 5.0 for subcortical segmentation
because it's better. Does
