I can't recommend anything in that case, since I am just relying on available,
but very scanty documentation.
I think people were using norm.mgz, but the question how these results
corespond to other volumes has not been addressed yet.
Some normative, semi-technical paper on QA measures in
it depends on which gm you are looking at. For cortex you can use the
brain.mgz, for any subcortical structure you can use the norm
cheers
Bruce
On Mon, 27 Jul
2015, Jacek Manko wrote:
I can't recommend anything in that case, since I am just relying on available,
but very scanty
Excellent, thank you for sharing! I have one more question.
When running the mri_cnr function I tried using a number of different .mgz
files with varying results, which would you recommend for the most accurate
gm/wm and gm/csf CNR?
Best,
KZ
