Hi Gabriel

remove the -check from your command line

cheers
Bruce
On Fri, 21 Dec 2012, Gabriel Gonzalez Escamilla wrote:


Thanks for your reply Anastasia,

You totally got it, I must say that actually have the Mori tract atlas, in
nii format. But the thing I'm looking for, is to use this WM parcellation to
parcellate WM of my subjects in FS.

I have tried to use recon-all tools for successfully reconstruct the
MNI152_1mm subject supplied by FSL (as is the same used in the Mori atlas),
I have transformed my mori_labels_atlas into mgz and change to the subject
space by a resampling and adding the talairach.xfm to the header of the
seg_atlas.mgz. This method sets everything onto the FS_MNI_305 space. All
these steps worked as you can see in the attached image.

Then, I have tried to use mri_ca train to get the gca file as:
mri_ca train -prior_spacing2 -node_spacing 8 -mask
$FSreconned_MNI152/brain.mgz -parc_dir JHU.ICBMtracts.1mm.mgz -zform
talairach.xfm -T1 norm.mgz -check FSreconned_MNI152
JHU.ICBMtracts.1mm.2012-12-20.gca

It always try to check the left_pallidum label and right_putamen and fails
in many coordenates and outputs.

ERROR: mri_ca_tain check found 1 subjects with bad labels!

I checked and all the mgz files are in uchar format, I don't know if the
problem is that I already have all labels into a single mgz file, In that
case, how can I compute the gca file?

Do you have any advice for me?

Bests,
Gabriel.

PD. If you are agree I will repost this to the FS-list, beacuse may be
helpuful for someone else. And may be get some more tips from the others.




El 20/12/12, Anastasia Yendiki <ayend...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu> escribió:

      Hi Gabriel - If you just need volumetric labels of the Mori
      tracts, you can get that directly by downloading their atlas.
      The tracula atlas doesn't have an average volume (it doesn't
      represent the tracts as volumes at all) and in any case you'd
      still have the problem of registering your individuals to a
      common space (it sounds like you want to use fsaverage as your
      common space, which tracula is independent of). Am I
      misunderstanding what you're asking?

      a.y

      On Wed, 19 Dec 2012, Gabriel Gonzalez Escamilla wrote:

      >Dear Anastasia Yendiki,
      >
      >
      >My name is Gabriel, I'm a student on a Spanish university,
      working with MRI and FS, I?m
      >looking for a new way to parcellate the WM on a group of
      subjects (without DTI data)
      >processed with FS v5.1. I know there exist some WM fiber atlas,
      but I saw that you have
      >develop something that could match more precisely the FS space
      on my subjects, and as you
      >have as background the Mori atlas, that to my knowledge, is the
      most complete WM atlas (Mori
      >et al., 1999; Wakana et al., 2007).
      >
      >I have found in your 2011 tracula paper, the next phrase:
      >
      >?We have developed TRACULA (TRActs Constrained by UnderLying
      Anatomy), a method for automated
      >reconstruction of major white-matter pathways that is based on
      the global probabilistic
      >approach of Jbabdi et al. (2007) and utilizes prior information
      on the anatomy of the
      >pathways from a set of training subjects. Once the pathways
      have been labeled manually in the
      >training set, their trajectories are combined with an automatic
      anatomical segmentation of
      >the same subject (Dale et al., 1999; Fischl et al., 1999a,b,
      2002, 2004a,b; Fischl and Dale,
      >2000) to derive a description of the pathways in terms of the
      structures that they intersect
      >and neighbour. The knowledge on path anatomy that is extracted
      from the training set is then
      >used to initialize a global probabilistic tractography
      algorithm and also to constrain its
      >search space by penalizing connections that do not match our
      prior anatomical knowledge. This
      >allows the algorithm to reconstruct the pathways reliably in a
      novel subject with no manual
      >intervention, facilitating the analysis of large data sets.?
      >
      >I?m wondering if the manually labeled pathways (trajectories)
      combined in an anatomical
      >segmentation of the same subject are available? or if this
      subject is distributed somehow
      >with FS v5.1?
      >
      >Or if can you give me an advice of how to proceed to make my
      own from a stardard atlas (i.e.
      >JHU_atlas in MNI space).
      >
      >
      >Many thanks in advanced,
      >
      >Gabriel.
      >
      >
      >
      >


      The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person
      to whom it is
      addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error
      and the e-mail
      contains patient information, please contact the Partners
      Compliance HelpLine at
      http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent
      to you in error
      but does not contain patient information, please contact the
      sender and properly
      dispose of the e-mail.


_______________________________________________
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer


The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is
addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail
contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at
http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error
but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly
dispose of the e-mail.

Reply via email to