[Freesurfer] Supratentorial Volume Versus Sum of Parts

2015-07-14 Thread Christopher Owen
Hello, We're trying to make multiple comparisons between FreeSurfer outputs on severely atrophied brains and controls. Some of the comparisons are regions of interest, like hippocampal volume or the volumes of regions in the frontal lobe, but we've also been making comparisons with supratentorialn

Re: [Freesurfer] Supratentorial Volume Versus Sum of Parts

2015-07-14 Thread Harms, Michael
July 14, 2015 9:46 AM To: "freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu" <freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu> Subject: [Freesurfer] Supratentorial Volume Versus Sum of Parts Hello, We're trying to make multiple comparisons between FreeSurfer outputs on severely atrophied brains and controls. Some of

Re: [Freesurfer] Supratentorial Volume Versus Sum of Parts

2015-07-14 Thread Douglas N Greve
r.mgh.harvard.edu>> > Date: Tuesday, July 14, 2015 9:46 AM > To: "freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu > <mailto:freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>" > mailto:freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>> > Subject: [Freesurfer] Supratentorial Volume Versus Sum of Parts > >

Re: [Freesurfer] Supratentorial Volume Versus Sum of Parts

2015-07-28 Thread Christopher Owen
Hello Douglas, Sorry about the delay. I was focusing on preparations for a conference. In the most current case, no, the regions that are supposed to make up the supratentorial volume do not add up to the volume displayed by freesurfer. The sum of the parts for supratentoral notvent seems to be a