Thanks,
>
>
> Amanda
>
> ----------------
> *From:* Jovicich, Jorge
> *Sent:* 20 September 2017 15:51:40
> *To:* Worker, Amanda
> *Cc:* Freesurfer support list
> *Subject:* Re: [Freesurfer] Test-retest reli
ich, Jorge"
Cc: Freesurfer support list
Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] Test-retest reliability in longitudinal data
Hi,
Thank you very much for your fast response. I had thought that it would make
sense to use the exact same pipeline, as I would be using in a longitudinal
study in future. If I coul
ppreciated.
Thanks,
Amanda
From: Jovicich, Jorge
Sent: 20 September 2017 15:51:40
To: Worker, Amanda
Cc: Freesurfer support list
Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] Test-retest reliability in longitudinal data
Hi Aman
rfer support list
Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] Test-retest reliability in longitudinal data
Hi Amanda,
I would recommend you to quantify reliability using the same processing
pipeline you will use to test for longitudinal effects in your sample.
Relevant literature include those listed below. For r
Hi Amanda,
I would recommend you to quantify reliability using the same processing
pipeline you will use to test for longitudinal effects in your sample.
Relevant literature include those listed below. For reliability you
would want to evaluate subjects over a time period in which you do not
Hi Amanda
it really depends what your goal is. If you want to estimate the noise
for a power analysis and you are going to process the data longitudinally,
then certainly you should use the longitudinal stream to measure the
reliability
cheers
Bruce
On Wed, 20 Sep 2017, Worker, Amanda wrot
Hi all,
I have a longitudinal dataset that I'd like to calculate test-retest
reliability for. However, I am not sure whether to calculate this for the
cross-sectionally processed data or longitudinal data? It would seem to make
sense to use the cross-sectional data, as the time points are inde
