Re: [Freesurfer] Version 6.0 patches for hi-res data

2020-01-25 Thread Greve, Douglas N.,Ph.D.
correct On 1/24/20 10:13 PM, Alexopoulos, Dimitrios wrote: External Email - Use Caution Ok. But the updated patches will need to be applied to the data generated with the -hires flag? Jim On Jan 24, 2020 5:32 PM, "Greve, Douglas N.,Ph.D." wrote: For t

Re: [Freesurfer] Version 6.0 patches for hi-res data

2020-01-24 Thread Alexopoulos, Dimitrios
External Email - Use Caution Ok. But the updated patches will need to be applied to the data generated with the -hires flag? Jim On Jan 24, 2020 5:32 PM, "Greve, Douglas N.,Ph.D." wrote: For the -conf2hires, there is no problem because the segmentation is done at 1mm. On 1/

Re: [Freesurfer] Version 6.0 patches for hi-res data

2020-01-24 Thread Greve, Douglas N.,Ph.D.
For the -conf2hires, there is no problem because the segmentation is done at 1mm. On 1/24/2020 5:17 PM, Alexopoulos, Dimitrios wrote: External Email - Use Caution I came across info for version 6.0 that generated statistical errors when using high resolution input. https://surfer.nmr.mg

[Freesurfer] Version 6.0 patches for hi-res data

2020-01-24 Thread Alexopoulos, Dimitrios
External Email - Use Caution I came across info for version 6.0 that generated statistical errors when using high resolution input. https://surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/fswiki/BrainVolStatsFixed We have used the '-hires' flag and, more recently, the '-conf2hires' flag with recon-a