Re: RE: [Freesurfer] automated parcellation: training set of Freesurfer

2007-10-02 Thread Bruce Fischl
for your reply! Sincerely Woo Suk, Tae -Original Message- From: Bruce Fischl [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, October 01, 2007 9:03 PM To: Woo Suk, Tae Cc: freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] automated parcellation: training set of Freesurfer there are two

Re: [Freesurfer] automated parcellation: training set of Freesurfer

2007-10-01 Thread Bruce Fischl
there are two training sets we use for the two difference parcellation schemes. Once consists of about 40 subjects distributed into 4 groups (young, middle aged, elderly and Alzheimer's for the Desikan-Killiany atlas). The other is 14 young and middle aged subjects in the Destrieux atlas.

RE: [Freesurfer] automated parcellation: training set of Freesurfer

2007-10-01 Thread Woo Suk, Tae
: freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] automated parcellation: training set of Freesurfer there are two training sets we use for the two difference parcellation schemes. Once consists of about 40 subjects distributed into 4 groups (young, middle aged, elderly and Alzheimer's

[Freesurfer] automated parcellation: training set of Freesurfer

2007-09-30 Thread Woo Suk, Tae
Dear experts. In the previous technical papers of Freesurfer, the the method of automated parcellation was described, This procedure automatically assigns a neuroanatomical label to each voxel in an MRI volume based on probabilistic information automatically estimated from manually labeled

Re: [Freesurfer] automated parcellation

2005-11-04 Thread Bruce Fischl
Hi Goulven, we need to know what the mris_register command line was, and what the mris_ca_label command line was, as well as what version of freesurfer you are running in general. cheers, Bruce On Fri, 4 Nov 2005, Goulven Josse wrote: Hi Xiao, I don't have a recon-all.log file because we

Re: [Freesurfer] automated parcellation

2005-11-03 Thread Bruce Fischl
Hi Goulven, could you send us an image with some arrows on it? cheers, Bruce On Wed, 2 Nov 2005, Goulven Josse wrote: Dear Freesurfers, We have used the automated parcellation (Fischl et al, 2004) in several subjects and noticed in some cases labeling of the lateral part of a gyrus (i

Re: [Freesurfer] automated parcellation

2005-11-03 Thread Doug Greve
To eliminate the possibility of a SUMA/FreeSurfer incompatibility, can you send pics displayed in tksurfer? Also, to clarify, this is a label for a subject shown on that subject (ie, you did not map the label from one subject to another)? thanks doug Goulven Josse wrote: Hi, I

Re: [Freesurfer] automated parcellation

2005-11-03 Thread Bruce Fischl
Hi Goulven, can you send the recon-all.log file for one of these subjects? What version of freesurfer are you using? Bruce On Thu, 3 Nov 2005, Goulven Josse wrote: On Nov 3, 2005, at 10:59 AM, Doug Greve wrote: To eliminate the possibility of a SUMA/FreeSurfer incompatibility, can you

Re: [Freesurfer] automated parcellation

2005-11-03 Thread Xiao Han
Hi Goulven, There should be a recon-all.log file under the $SUBJECTS_DIR/subject/script/ directory, if you processed the data using the recon-all script. The log files you attached were produced by the tools to visuallize the results, not by the programs that create the label result. Thus we

[Freesurfer] automated parcellation

2005-11-02 Thread Goulven Josse
Dear Freesurfers, We have used the automated parcellation (Fischl et al, 2004) in several subjects and noticed in some cases labeling of the lateral part of a gyrus (i mean the part that's visible on the folded surface), as belonging to a sulcus. The example I have in mind is the labeling of