This suggests that the number of values in the .mgh file is different
than the number of vertices in the surface. Did you regenerate the
surface after generating the .mgh file?
On Sun, 2007-05-13 at 15:29 -0400, Catherine Hartley wrote:
Hi,
I'm having a problem with the development version of
you can use mri_info on the .mgh file to check (and mris_info on the
surface)
On Mon, 14 May 2007, Kevin Teich wrote:
This suggests that the number of values in the .mgh file is different
than the number of vertices in the surface. Did you regenerate the
surface after generating the .mgh file?
Hi,
I can't seem to get the syntax right for mri_info or mris_info to
work, but i did not regenerate the surfaces after generating the .mgh
file, so the number of vertices should be the same. Any other
possibilities? Should I just rerun the mri_glmfit that generated the
sig.mgh file?
Hi Cate,
there's not much syntax to get write. They take either a volume or a
surface file, with the full path.
Bruce
On Mon, 14 May 2007, Catherine Hartley
wrote:
Hi,
I can't seem to get the syntax right for mri_info or mris_info to work, but i
did not regenerate the surfaces after
Hi,
I'm having a problem with the development version of tksurfer. When
I try to load a sig.mgh file as an overlay, I get the following error:
% surfer: couldn't load /Applications/freesurfer/subjects/reruns/
glmleft/ReappCSplusContrast/sig.mgh
sclv_read_from_volume: error in FunD_New
