Re: [Freesurfer] excessive topological defect

2015-12-14 Thread Bruce Fischl
Hi Elisabetta can you describe what you did in this case? I'm puzzled because the brain.finalsurfs.mgz and the wm.mgz both contain skull in them and don't like they have been skull stripped at all, but the brainmask.auto.mgz (which is the output of our skull stripping) looks like it worked well

Re: [Freesurfer] excessive topological defect

2015-11-20 Thread Elisabetta del Re
Hi Bruce, no, but do you mean by the entire subject directory? Thank you so much, regards, E. On Fri, Nov 20, 2015 at 1:45 PM, Bruce Fischl wrote: > Hi Elisabetta > > we would need the entire subject directory. Did you look at the surfaces > I suggested? > > cheers > Bruce > On Fri, 20 Nov 2015,

Re: [Freesurfer] excessive topological defect

2015-11-20 Thread Bruce Fischl
Hi Elisabetta we would need the entire subject directory. Did you look at the surfaces I suggested? cheers Bruce On Fri, 20 Nov 2015, Elisabetta del Re wrote: > Hi Bruce, > thank you so much. > I attach here T1 of 2 of the cases. > Thank you again, > regards, > Elisabetta > > On 11/4/15, Bruce

Re: [Freesurfer] excessive topological defect

2015-11-20 Thread Elisabetta del Re
Hi Bruce, thank you so much. I attach here T1 of 2 of the cases. Thank you again, regards, Elisabetta On 11/4/15, Bruce Fischl wrote: > Hi Elisabetta > > I don't think that's an error, just a warning. That said, a defect with > 38K vertices is awfully big, almost 1/4 of the surface, which usually

Re: [Freesurfer] excessive topological defect

2015-11-04 Thread Bruce Fischl
Hi Elisabetta I don't think that's an error, just a warning. That said, a defect with 38K vertices is awfully big, almost 1/4 of the surface, which usually means something big is wrong (e.g. cerebellum or skull attached to the hemi). Can you look at the orig.nofix or the inflated.nofix and see