of Douglas N. Greve
*Sent:* Monday, February 21, 2022 6:29 PM
*To:* freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
*Subject:* Re: [Freesurfer] mri_glmfit of surface CBF maps while
regressing out cortical thickness
I just updated the code to accept PVRs. I'm not sure what I have to do
to test it; I guess I need to run
,
Asim
From: freesurfer-boun...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
on behalf of Douglas N. Greve
Sent: Monday, February 21, 2022 6:29 PM
To: freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] mri_glmfit of surface CBF maps while regressing out
cortical thickness
I just
.
Best,
Asim
*From:* Dhungana, Asim
*Sent:* Monday, February 14, 2022 11:45 AM
*To:* Freesurfer support list
*Subject:* Re: [Freesurfer] mri_glmfit of surface CBF maps while
regressing out cortical thickness
OK, I see. How
arvard.edu
on behalf of Douglas N. Greve
Sent: Sunday, February 13, 2022 5:29 PM
To: freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] mri_glmfit of surface CBF maps while regressing out
cortical thickness
Re: long run time. Sorry, permutation will not work with PVR.
Re: mean thic
ebruary 13, 2022 5:29 PM
To: freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] mri_glmfit of surface CBF maps while regressing out
cortical thickness
Re: long run time. Sorry, permutation will not work with PVR.
Re: mean thickness. Use the eres.mgh from you osgm analysis instead of the raw
Re: long run time. Sorry, permutation will not work with PVR.
Re: mean thickness. Use the eres.mgh from you osgm analysis instead of
the raw thickness map (lh.thickness.fwhm10.mgh)
On 2/8/2022 4:12 PM, Dhungana, Asim wrote:
Dear Freesurfer experts,
I am trying to run a GLM analysis
Dear Freesurfer experts,
I am trying to run a GLM analysis comparing the difference in the cortical CBF
maps between two groups, but I would like to regress out cortical thickness. I
read through a post with a similar question
