Re: [Freesurfer] question about image size

2016-07-21 Thread Dorsa Haji Ghaffari
Thank you I'll try that. On Thursday, July 21, 2016, Bruce Fischl wrote: > try using the -rl switch in mri_convert. It will "reslice > like" the you give. Give it the 512 volume as > > cheers > Bruce > On Thu, > 21 Jul 2016, Dorsa Haji Ghaffari wrote: > > > Hi, > > I have segmented 288 slices

Re: [Freesurfer] question about image size

2016-07-21 Thread Bruce Fischl
try using the -rl switch in mri_convert. It will "reslice like" the you give. Give it the 512 volume as cheers Bruce On Thu, 21 Jul 2016, Dorsa Haji Ghaffari wrote: > Hi, > I have segmented 288 slices of 512x512 dicom MRIs but when I create a mask of > the > left thalamus I get 256 slices o

[Freesurfer] question about image size

2016-07-21 Thread Dorsa Haji Ghaffari
Hi, I have segmented 288 slices of 512x512 dicom MRIs but when I create a mask of the left thalamus I get 256 slices of 256x256 images. Is there any way to get the same number of slices with the same size as I had before? Thank you Dorsa ___ Freesurfer

Re: [Freesurfer] question about image size

2008-08-01 Thread Doug Greve
Can you send us the result of running mri_info on both of the volumes? Lindsay Casmaer wrote: Hello all, I am looking at using the Freesurfer white matter images in conjunction with PET PIB analysis. When I compare the wm.mgz image with the T88 image in Analyze, the wm image appears almost 10 p

[Freesurfer] question about image size

2008-08-01 Thread Lindsay Casmaer
Hello all, I am looking at using the Freesurfer white matter images in conjunction with PET PIB analysis. When I compare the wm.mgz image with the T88 image in Analyze, the wm image appears almost 10 percent smaller in both height and width when compared with the wm in the T88 mprage. Are the imag