Re: [Freesurfer] surfaceholes in aseg.stats

2019-12-05 Thread Bruce Fischl
-boun...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu on behalf of Greve, Douglas N.,Ph.D. Sent: Tuesday, December 3, 2019 2:16 PM To: freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] surfaceholes in aseg.stats   Those are the number of defects in the ?h.orig.nofix. Not sure why the two people see different

Re: [Freesurfer] surfaceholes in aseg.stats

2019-12-05 Thread Laurel Quinlan
...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu on behalf of Greve, Douglas N.,Ph.D. Sent: Tuesday, December 3, 2019 2:16 PM To: freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] surfaceholes in aseg.stats Those are the number of defects in the ?h.orig.nofix. Not sure why the two people see different numbers. Are you totally sure

Re: [Freesurfer] surfaceholes in aseg.stats

2019-12-03 Thread Greve, Douglas N.,Ph.D.
Those are the number of defects in the ?h.orig.nofix. Not sure why the two people see different numbers. Are you totally sure they are being run in exactly the same way? If they made different edits (control points, brain mask) then it could result in different number of holes On 12/3/2019 2:38

[Freesurfer] surfaceholes in aseg.stats

2019-12-03 Thread Laurel Quinlan
External Email - Use Caution Hi Freesurfer Support, I'm wondering how ?h.surfaceholes prior to fixing and "Total number of defect holes in surfaces prior to fixing" are calculated in the aseg.stats file for each brain. I compared aseg.stats files for the same brain edited by two