Not sure if this went through the first time yesterday, here it is again.
Thanks.
I've noticed that the gray matter volume output from mris_anatomical_stats
(lh) vs. mris_volume (lh.pial) differs. Am I missing something? Do I
need to run mris_volume for a different surface? Thanks.
-Derin
you would need to subtract the ?h.white volume from the ?h.pial to get
gm volume
On Tue, 6 Feb 2007, Derin Cobia wrote:
Not sure if this went through the first time yesterday, here it is again.
Thanks.
I've noticed that the gray matter volume output from mris_anatomical_stats
(lh) vs. mris_v
Then is there a reason to use mris_volume when I can just do
mris_anatomical_stats and forget the math?
So, if I take the ?h.pial volume then add in the subcortical structure
volumes from aseg.stats (as you mentioned earlier) then that would give me
the estimated whole brain volume? Thanks Bruce!
is whole brain volume all you care about?
On Tue, 6 Feb 2007, Derin Cobia
wrote:
Then is there a reason to use mris_volume when I can just do
mris_anatomical_stats and forget the math?
So, if I take the ?h.pial volume then add in the subcortical structure
volumes from aseg.stats (as you menti
For one of our projects. We're using cortical gray matter for another
(which I wanted to clarify).
-Derin
> On Tue, 6 Feb 2007, Derin Cobia
> wrote:
>
>> Then is there a reason to use mris_volume when I can just do
>> mris_anatomical_stats and forget the math?
>>
>> So, if I take the ?h.pial vol
Hi Derin,
so I guess I would use brain volume as the surface volumes of the gray
and the white + subcortical volumes (and cerebellum).
Bruce
On Tue, 6 Feb 2007, Derin Cobia wrote:
For one of our projects. We're using cortical gray matter for another
(which I wanted to clarify).
-Derin
