there is a lot of overlap but they are not quite the same. I think 30-35 of
them are the same, but a few are different.
On Wed, 22 Apr 2009, Michael Harms wrote:
And just to bring this discussion full circle, how does the training set
for the subcortical segmentation relate?? Is the traini
And just to bring this discussion full circle, how does the training set
for the subcortical segmentation relate?? Is the training set (and
associated manual labeling) that is used for the subcortical
segmentation composed of the same 39 subjects used for both the current
spherical template and
template: CMA training set
Hi Jennifer,
the spherical stuff has nothing to do with the CMA. And in fact the
spherical registration itself is not based on any manual labelings, just
estimates of cortical geometry from a set of training subjects. The
cortical parcellations do depend on manual
Hi Jennifer,
the spherical stuff has nothing to do with the CMA. And in fact the
spherical registration itself is not based on any manual labelings, just
estimates of cortical geometry from a set of training subjects. The
cortical parcellations do depend on manual labelings, but this is also
