On Sep 18, 2008, at 4:13 PM, Brian West wrote:
> Not sure exactly what you're getting at on bullet point #3... I think
> at this stage you are better off going on IRC where you can get a
> realtime response...
>
> #freeswitch @ irc.freenode.net
>
>
> /b
>
> On Sep 18, 2008, at 2:56 PM, Christian
Not sure exactly what you're getting at on bullet point #3... I think
at this stage you are better off going on IRC where you can get a
realtime response...
#freeswitch @ irc.freenode.net
/b
On Sep 18, 2008, at 2:56 PM, Christian Jensen wrote:
> So, is it fair then to make the definition t
So, is it fair then to make the definition that the default context is best
for calls that are considered outbound and that public is best for inbound?
If that is the case, then can I lobby to have the public.xml also include a
line maybe like:
and then I would drop in my provider DID stuff in t
On Sep 18, 2008, at 5:24 AM, Christian Jensen wrote:
Hi everyone,
I am in the process of doing something very straightforward -
hooking up a DID from Link2Voip into my FS instance (built from SVN
Curent on Debian)
In an effort to only change as little as possible to get this baby
to re
Hi everyone,
I am in the process of doing something very straightforward - hooking up a
DID from Link2Voip into my FS instance (built from SVN Curent on Debian)
In an effort to only change as little as possible to get this baby to
respond to a phone call, I have simply added my provider into the
