we already looked at this long ago it only supports 1 db of this nature and
it cannot be shared.
its not going to happen.
On Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 5:47 PM, Tamas wrote:
> Hello,
>
> this feature sounds interesting in case of running FS as a softphone base,
> where access rights are usually limi
Hello,
this feature sounds interesting in case of running FS as a softphone
base, where access rights are usually limited and not straightforward
to make tmpfs.
Also running from something like readonly filesystem it could be
interesting addon (this won't solve the write requirements of logs a
This is all unnecessary, just toss them on tmpfs and call it a day.
Mike
On Feb 16, 2010, at 6:04 PM, Paulo Vicentini wrote:
> Hello,
> "The core will open the db multiple times so you would end up with many
> instances not linked to each other."
>
> I think it might work with just one core.d
Hello,
"The core will open the db multiple times so you would end up with many
instances not linked to each other."
I think it might work with just one core.db handle, right?
"If sofia uses it, it needs it, or else it would've been an optional
configuration option."
As I can see until now, if m
