Re: [Freeswitch-dev] core odbc vs in-module mysql

2010-02-26 Thread Daniel-Constantin Mierla
Hi, On 02/26/2010 08:46 PM, Michael Jerris wrote: > lots of people complain about the huge overhead of odbc and how horrible it > is, there are lot of discussions on the web about this topic, apart of casual fud cases, perhaps there is something generating all these. However, personally I have

Re: [Freeswitch-dev] core odbc vs in-module mysql

2010-02-26 Thread Michael Jerris
lots of people complain about the huge overhead of odbc and how horrible it is, and every time I ask them to show me some real numbers that show a significant performance impact. Of all those who have loudly complained about the horrors of odbc, I have not had a single person take me up on my r

Re: [Freeswitch-dev] core odbc vs in-module mysql

2010-02-26 Thread Daniel-Constantin Mierla
On 02/26/2010 05:08 PM, Anthony Minessale wrote: We use the odbc for any in-tree sql stuff because we are trying to remain database agnostic. if it's your own module it's ok but if you want to contribute it, we would appreciate using ODBC ok, thanks. If I understood the architecture, default s

Re: [Freeswitch-dev] Call for help - adding information to the wiki: SIP ALG's

2010-02-26 Thread Brian West
S true... I can't count the time I have wasted because of a SIP ALG messing with my packets. /b On Feb 26, 2010, at 11:07 AM, Kristian Kielhofner wrote: > Oh come on Brian, they're not worth it! ;) > > On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 10:24 AM, Brian West wrote: >> Or break the arms of the guys th

Re: [Freeswitch-dev] Call for help - adding information to the wiki: SIP ALG's

2010-02-26 Thread Kristian Kielhofner
Oh come on Brian, they're not worth it! ;) On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 10:24 AM, Brian West wrote: > Or break the arms of the guys that thought it was a great idea fuck with SIP > packets on the router... > > /b > -- Kristian Kielhofner http://www.astlinux.org http://blog.krisk.org http://www.sta

[Freeswitch-dev] FSComm basic issue

2010-02-26 Thread Suneel Papineni
Hi, I am trying to use FSComm with Freeswitch and facing following issues. 1. Using pre-build binary (windows), when the application is started FSComm is getting Registered properly. When I tried to make a call, UI displays Dialing... but unable to see any SIP (INVITE) messages in wi

Re: [Freeswitch-dev] core odbc vs in-module mysql

2010-02-26 Thread Anthony Minessale
We use the odbc for any in-tree sql stuff because we are trying to remain database agnostic. if it's your own module it's ok but if you want to contribute it, we would appreciate using ODBC On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 5:29 AM, Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote: > Hello, > > is it something particular

[Freeswitch-dev] core odbc vs in-module mysql

2010-02-26 Thread Daniel-Constantin Mierla
Hello, is it something particular that recommends usage of core odbc api instead of connecting from a module directly to mysql database? I'm fine to keep using sqlite for the rest of FS needs, just need to do fast access to mysql, therefore I try to avoid the extra layer added by odbc. Thanks,

Re: [Freeswitch-dev] Call for help - adding information to the wiki: SIP ALG's

2010-02-26 Thread Brian West
Or break the arms of the guys that thought it was a great idea fuck with SIP packets on the router... /b On Feb 26, 2010, at 9:11 AM, Kristian Kielhofner wrote: > The only universal way to defeat SIP ALGs is to use TLS. They can't > break what they can't see. :)

Re: [Freeswitch-dev] Call for help - adding information to the wiki: SIP ALG's

2010-02-26 Thread Kristian Kielhofner
The only universal way to defeat SIP ALGs is to use TLS. They can't break what they can't see. :) On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 11:08 PM, Michael Collins wrote: > Hi all, > > I've just completed a new wiki page: > > http://wiki.freeswitch.org/wiki/ALG > > I would like all of you who have dealt with ro