Re: [Freeswitch-dev] OPTIONS

2009-11-20 Thread Trixter aka Bret McDanel
On Fri, 2009-11-20 at 11:15 +, Suneel Papineni wrote: > Hi Anthony, > > > > In case if an application is written to send continuous messages to > FS, how to stop responding to that IP or stop messages reaching to FS > from that IP. (like a DoS attack). Is there any provision at FS or do > w

Re: [Freeswitch-dev] OPTIONS

2009-11-20 Thread Brian West
man iptables /b On Nov 20, 2009, at 5:15 AM, Suneel Papineni wrote: Hi Anthony, In case if an application is written to send continuous messages to FS, how to stop responding to that IP or stop messages reaching to FS from that IP. (like a DoS attack). Is there any provision at FS or do

Re: [Freeswitch-dev] OPTIONS

2009-11-20 Thread Suneel Papineni
properly. Thanks Suneel From: freeswitch-dev-boun...@lists.freeswitch.org [mailto:freeswitch-dev-boun...@lists.freeswitch.org] On Behalf Of Anthony Minessale Sent: 19 November 2009 15:24 To: freeswitch-dev@lists.freeswitch.org Subject: Re: [Freeswitch-dev] OPTIONS You cant block options but

Re: [Freeswitch-dev] OPTIONS

2009-11-19 Thread Suneel Papineni
To: freeswitch-dev@lists.freeswitch.org Subject: Re: [Freeswitch-dev] OPTIONS You cant block options but you can block new invites with "fsctl pause" That would cause the calls to fail over to the2nd route at least until the current calls are over. That is the only solution there is

Re: [Freeswitch-dev] OPTIONS

2009-11-19 Thread Anthony Minessale
aka Bret McDanel > Sent: 19 November 2009 13:44 > To: freeswitch-dev@lists.freeswitch.org > Subject: Re: [Freeswitch-dev] OPTIONS > > On Thu, 2009-11-19 at 13:23 +, Suneel Papineni wrote: > > > So is there anyway to instruct FS (through event sockets), not to > > respond

Re: [Freeswitch-dev] OPTIONS

2009-11-19 Thread Suneel Papineni
-boun...@lists.freeswitch.org] On Behalf Of Trixter aka Bret McDanel Sent: 19 November 2009 13:44 To: freeswitch-dev@lists.freeswitch.org Subject: Re: [Freeswitch-dev] OPTIONS On Thu, 2009-11-19 at 13:23 +, Suneel Papineni wrote: > So is there anyway to instruct FS (through event sockets)

Re: [Freeswitch-dev] OPTIONS

2009-11-19 Thread Trixter aka Bret McDanel
On Thu, 2009-11-19 at 13:23 +, Suneel Papineni wrote: > So is there anyway to instruct FS (through event sockets), not to > respond to OPTIONS message received from the GW. I would think that adding code to do that would cause some breakage. The better solution would be to have a trigger on

Re: [Freeswitch-dev] OPTIONS

2009-11-19 Thread Suneel Papineni
: 18 November 2009 17:53 To: freeswitch-dev@lists.freeswitch.org Subject: Re: [Freeswitch-dev] OPTIONS Why would you not want to respond to those? On Nov 18, 2009, at 12:07 PM, Suneel Papineni wrote: Hi, Is there anyway that I can instruct FS, not to send response to OPTIONS message

Re: [Freeswitch-dev] OPTIONS

2009-11-18 Thread Michael Jerris
Why would you not want to respond to those? On Nov 18, 2009, at 12:07 PM, Suneel Papineni wrote: > Hi, > > Is there anyway that I can instruct FS, not to send response to OPTIONS > message that it has received from an IP or any IP. > > Thanks & Regards > Suneel

[Freeswitch-dev] OPTIONS

2009-11-18 Thread Suneel Papineni
Hi, Is there anyway that I can instruct FS, not to send response to OPTIONS message that it has received from an IP or any IP. Thanks & Regards Suneel * Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail