Re: [Freeswitch-users] Question about installing freeswitch - SOLVED

2008-04-16 Thread Pete Kay
Hi, I made a silly mistake. The problem was solved. Please ignore. Thanks. Regards, Pete On Thu, Apr 17, 2008 at 12:38 PM, Pete Kay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > I followed the online installation but when I executed, make sure or > make moh, I am getting the following errors: > > s

[Freeswitch-users] Question about installing freeswitch

2008-04-16 Thread Pete Kay
Hi, I followed the online installation but when I executed, make sure or make moh, I am getting the following errors: ser:/usr/src/freeswitch-1.0.rc2/build# make moh-install make: *** No rule to make target `moh-install'. Stop. ser:/usr/src/freeswitch-1.0.rc2/build# What could be the problem?

Re: [Freeswitch-users] Missing bootstrap

2008-04-16 Thread Michael Jerris
That being said, there is an open bug that the tarballs only work with automake 1.9. That will be fixed in the next rc. Mike On Apr 16, 2008, at 10:54 PM, "Anthony Minessale" <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote: rc2 and up is pre bootstrapped. On Wed, Apr 16, 2008 at 10:46 PM, Peder @ NetworkObli

Re: [Freeswitch-users] Missing bootstrap

2008-04-16 Thread Anthony Minessale
rc2 and up is pre bootstrapped. On Wed, Apr 16, 2008 at 10:46 PM, Peder @ NetworkOblivion < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > FYI, rc2 and rc3 both appear to be missing bootstrap.sh. It is in rc1. > I copied it from rc1 to rc3 and it squawked about missing docs/COPYING > and docs/AUTHORS, but it appe

[Freeswitch-users] Missing bootstrap

2008-04-16 Thread Peder @ NetworkOblivion
FYI, rc2 and rc3 both appear to be missing bootstrap.sh. It is in rc1. I copied it from rc1 to rc3 and it squawked about missing docs/COPYING and docs/AUTHORS, but it appears to be running the rest of the setup so far. Peder ___ Freeswitch-users ma

[Freeswitch-users] Freeswitch with Hylafax and Freeswitch with E1

2008-04-16 Thread Pete Kay
Hi, Two more questions about Freeswitch. I have some application written to send and receive fax using Hylafax and IAXModem, will I be able to port that to Freeswitch? What is the best way to connect Freeswitch to an E1? Does anyone has experience with any easy-to-use, easy-to-maintain hardware

Re: [Freeswitch-users] New feature - NAT handling, keep-alive OPTIONS

2008-04-16 Thread kokoska rokoska
Anthony Minessale napsal(a): > If you do the research and present us with some options I am open to > implementing them as long as it makes sense. > I do what I can and lets see :-) Thanks, Anthony! Best regards, kokoska.rokoska ___ Freeswitch-us

Re: [Freeswitch-users] New feature - NAT handling, keep-alive OPTIONS

2008-04-16 Thread Anthony Minessale
If you do the research and present us with some options I am open to implementing them as long as it makes sense. On Wed, Apr 16, 2008 at 1:56 PM, kokoska rokoska <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Michael Jerris napsal(a): > > I think with the volume of calls you are handling, this is one place >

Re: [Freeswitch-users] New feature - NAT handling, keep-alive OPTIONS

2008-04-16 Thread kokoska rokoska
Michael Jerris napsal(a): > I think with the volume of calls you are handling, this is one place > where openser will serve you better than freeswitch. You said you > already have openser in this role, why would you not want to use it? > Because I need B2BUA (for topology hiding, crappy UA

Re: [Freeswitch-users] Asterisk vs. Freeswitch

2008-04-16 Thread Brian West
Please digg and pass on http://digg.com/software/How_does_FreeSWITCH_compare_to_Asterisk /b ___ Freeswitch-users mailing list Freeswitch-users@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.

Re: [Freeswitch-users] New feature - NAT handling, keep-alive OPTIONS

2008-04-16 Thread Michael Jerris
I think with the volume of calls you are handling, this is one place where openser will serve you better than freeswitch. You said you already have openser in this role, why would you not want to use it? Mike. On Apr 16, 2008, at 1:09 PM, kokoska rokoska <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > >

Re: [Freeswitch-users] New feature - NAT handling, keep-alive OPTIONS

2008-04-16 Thread kokoska rokoska
Anthony Minessale napsal(a): > Apart from the few ways I mentioned, I don't know any other way. Thanks, Anthony, for clarification! > I am a > fan of the client using STUN rather than the server compensating. I too, but users around me not :-) Best regards, kokoska.rokoska

Re: [Freeswitch-users] What is Freeswitch equivalent of Asterisk AMI and Realtime

2008-04-16 Thread Anthony Minessale
You can also elect to create a module that interfaces to a db directly but we do not have one in tree because, as Brian said, the XML CURL was a more flexible option for a reference implementation. On Wed, Apr 16, 2008 at 12:11 PM, Brian West <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Apr 16, 2008, at 12

Re: [Freeswitch-users] New feature - NAT handling, keep-alive OPTIONS

2008-04-16 Thread Anthony Minessale
Apart from the few ways I mentioned, I don't know any other way. I am a fan of the client using STUN rather than the server compensating. On Wed, Apr 16, 2008 at 11:29 AM, kokoska rokoska <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Anthony Minessale napsal(a): > > Yes you remove the force-contact variable

Re: [Freeswitch-users] Asterisk vs. Freeswitch

2008-04-16 Thread Anthony Minessale
Perhaps this will help clarify. http://www.freeswitch.org/node/117 On Wed, Apr 16, 2008 at 6:15 AM, Pete Kay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > This question may have come up a few times already. I am working on > a application to provide IVR, voicemail, and tailored call routing > services.

Re: [Freeswitch-users] What is Freeswitch equivalent of Asterisk AMI and Realtime

2008-04-16 Thread Brian West
On Apr 16, 2008, at 12:07 PM, Pete Kay wrote: > Hi, > I took a look at xml_curl, is it ture that I need to write a PHP file > to create the xml that is in the same format as the config xml files? > Within PHP, I can go to the DB to featch the info to create the xml > format output. You can write

Re: [Freeswitch-users] Asterisk vs. Freeswitch - added question

2008-04-16 Thread Matt Klein
For Scalability, I'd choose Option B to limit the sip messages to increase another x fold from a subscriber base without putting processing power into simple overhead tasks such as options polling - responses for nat. For Fun, both can run on the same box -- make sure your gigabit port isn't

Re: [Freeswitch-users] Asterisk vs. Freeswitch - added question

2008-04-16 Thread Ken Rice
Pete, That's a debatable topic... Currently I'm doing over 40million minutes/month w/out using OpenSER... Here's the no "BS" low down... OpenSER will almost always end up faster then FreeSwitch in head to head SIP testing... The problem comes in however with the limited feature set of OpenSER an

Re: [Freeswitch-users] What is Freeswitch equivalent of Asterisk AMI and Realtime

2008-04-16 Thread Pete Kay
Hi, I took a look at xml_curl, is it ture that I need to write a PHP file to create the xml that is in the same format as the config xml files? Within PHP, I can go to the DB to featch the info to create the xml format output. Is that correct? So, there is no direct DB access like Asterisk real-t

Re: [Freeswitch-users] Asterisk vs. Freeswitch - added question

2008-04-16 Thread Pete Kay
Hi, One scalability question: Can someone provide input to the following options? Option A: Asterisk ( for IVR, Voicemail, Conference) + Openser ( for SIP registration ) Option B: Freeswitch + Openser Option C: Freeswitch So, it is definite that Asterisk is not as scalable as Freeswitch. Among

Re: [Freeswitch-users] What is Freeswitch equivalent of Asterisk AMI and Realtime

2008-04-16 Thread Brian West
On Apr 16, 2008, at 11:44 AM, Pete Kay wrote: > Hi, > > I have studied the Freeswitch doc and can't find any info related to > setting up the sip users, queue, ans voicemail as a realtime DB, like > Asterisk does. Is this feature available? > xml_curl > If not, would it be a bit too much work

[Freeswitch-users] What is Freeswitch equivalent of Asterisk AMI and Realtime

2008-04-16 Thread Pete Kay
Hi, I have studied the Freeswitch doc and can't find any info related to setting up the sip users, queue, ans voicemail as a realtime DB, like Asterisk does. Is this feature available? If not, would it be a bit too much work to write to the XML all the times? Also, is there an Asterisk AMI-equi

Re: [Freeswitch-users] New feature - NAT handling, keep-alive OPTIONS

2008-04-16 Thread kokoska rokoska
Anthony Minessale napsal(a): > Yes you remove the force-contact variable from the tag and only > set it in the individual tag. > That is how you can pick and choose which ones do the options. > Thank you very much, Anthony, for your answer! Yes, I use force-contact per individual user, but

Re: [Freeswitch-users] Asterisk vs. Freeswitch - what about functionality

2008-04-16 Thread Matt Klein
Pete: Yes. All of the below, and more, are in tree and are available for your use. http://wiki.freeswitch.org/wiki/Mod_conference http://wiki.freeswitch.org/wiki/Mod_fifo http://wiki.freeswitch.org/wiki/Music_on_Hold (needs to be updated) http://wiki.freeswitch.org/wiki/Mod_voicemail On

Re: [Freeswitch-users] Asterisk vs. Freeswitch - what about functionality

2008-04-16 Thread Pete Kay
Hi, I have been seeing quite a few articles that mention Freeswitch is much more efficient than Asterisk. What about in terms of functionality? Can Freeswitch perform the same kind of functionality provided by Asterisk such as Queue, Conf call, MOH, Voicemail Main, etc? Can anyone give some inp

Re: [Freeswitch-users] Asterisk vs. Freeswitch - added question

2008-04-16 Thread Daniel Hefti
It's ok, I had an idea from what you meant, but that may have been because I was looking elsewhere and already had an idea what to expect. I originally thought you were comparing the amount of calls per some value... 10 calls in FS for every 1 call from asterisk for the same amount of value of

Re: [Freeswitch-users] javascript originate timeout problem

2008-04-16 Thread Jonas Gauffin
http://jira.freeswitch.org/browse/MODLANG-58 On Wed, Apr 16, 2008 at 4:23 PM, Jonas Gauffin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > No, I'm creating a new session: > > bleg = new Session(); > bleg.setCallerData("caller_id_name", > session.caller_id_name); >

Re: [Freeswitch-users] Asterisk vs. Freeswitch - added question

2008-04-16 Thread Ken Rice
Oh Oh! Shit... I made that sound like 10 FS boxes for 1 Asterisk box... I have my ratios backwards... Its 1 FS box for 10 Asterisk boxes... Sorry for the confusion this will invariably generate K > From: Ken Rice <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: > Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2008 10:04:06 -0500 > To: > S

Re: [Freeswitch-users] Asterisk vs. Freeswitch - added question

2008-04-16 Thread Brian West
Lets clarify here.. Its 10 Asterisk boxes to 1 FreeSWITCH box? /b On Apr 16, 2008, at 10:04 AM, Ken Rice wrote: > I have done testing with FS and Asterisk in similar configurations > on the > same hardware, avg ratio of call handling FreeSwitch:Asterisk is 10:1 __

Re: [Freeswitch-users] Asterisk vs. Freeswitch - added question

2008-04-16 Thread Ken Rice
Hmmm, I have done testing with FS and Asterisk in similar configurations on the same hardware, avg ratio of call handling FreeSwitch:Asterisk is 10:1 Simple test SIPP -> (FreeSwitch|Asterisk) Run SIPP to bring up channels doing media playback, then call in with a SIP device to listen to the qua

Re: [Freeswitch-users] ivr script, originating a call

2008-04-16 Thread Jonas Gauffin
http://jira.freeswitch.org/browse/MODLANG-56 On Wed, Apr 16, 2008 at 4:15 PM, Anthony Minessale <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Can you please file it on jira and attach the script to reproduce it and any > relevant logs? > > > > > On Wed, Apr 16, 2008 at 8:17 AM, Jonas Gauffin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >

Re: [Freeswitch-users] Asterisk vs. Freeswitch - added question

2008-04-16 Thread Marek Górecki
Hi FreeSWecialists, I'd like to extend title question for more details: assuming Asterisk efficiency (concurrent 'normal' calls processing) for given hardware (meaning any, but fixed configuration server) as 1 [ normal call understood as no codec translation, no tricks, nothing special - just one

Re: [Freeswitch-users] javascript originate timeout problem

2008-04-16 Thread Jonas Gauffin
No, I'm creating a new session: bleg = new Session(); bleg.setCallerData("caller_id_name", session.caller_id_name); bleg.setCallerData("caller_id_num", session.caller_id_num); destination = "{ignore_e

Re: [Freeswitch-users] javascript originate timeout problem

2008-04-16 Thread Anthony Minessale
Are you using the transfer app from your javascript? If so, and the script is running on the target channel that is being transferred it will cause the script to exit because transfer is effectively hangup as the act of transfer stops all execution of apps and sends the call to the dialplan. You c

Re: [Freeswitch-users] New feature - NAT handling, keep-alive OPTIONS

2008-04-16 Thread Anthony Minessale
Yes you remove the force-contact variable from the tag and only set it in the individual tag. That is how you can pick and choose which ones do the options. You can also configure a force-expires on each user so the register will reply with a very short expiry time to trigger the client to re-re

Re: [Freeswitch-users] ivr script, originating a call

2008-04-16 Thread Anthony Minessale
Can you please file it on jira and attach the script to reproduce it and any relevant logs? On Wed, Apr 16, 2008 at 8:17 AM, Jonas Gauffin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > But why do the sound files work for incoming calls, but not for calls > originated from a javascript? > this feature have worked

[Freeswitch-users] javascript originate timeout problem

2008-04-16 Thread Jonas Gauffin
Hello again =) I've made a call queue in javascript where the js takes orders from a server through a socket. The server monitors all extensions (through eventsocket) in the queue and tells the javascript to originate the call to a extension as soon as it becomes idle. Everything works fine excep

Re: [Freeswitch-users] ivr script, originating a call

2008-04-16 Thread Jonas Gauffin
But why do the sound files work for incoming calls, but not for calls originated from a javascript? this feature have worked fine before (can't say which revision). a full log is coming. On Wed, Apr 16, 2008 at 2:59 PM, Brian West <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Well you're playing a wav file aren't

Re: [Freeswitch-users] ivr script, originating a call

2008-04-16 Thread Brian West
Well you're playing a wav file aren't you? That is normal the codec for the call looks to be PCMU but to play the file it needs L16 so the core can translate it to the caller. Plus you seem to have not posted the full trace so I can see. console loglevel 8 and paste that. /b On Apr 16,

Re: [Freeswitch-users] is it support RFC 3428 feature?

2008-04-16 Thread Brian West
You didn't have to do that this extension already does that! ;) /b On Apr 15, 2008, at 11:12 PM, sunghoon lee wrote: > > > > > ___ Freeswitch-users mailing list Freeswitch-users@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.or

[Freeswitch-users] Asterisk vs. Freeswitch

2008-04-16 Thread Pete Kay
Hi, This question may have come up a few times already. I am working on a application to provide IVR, voicemail, and tailored call routing services. The SIP registration will be handled by Openser, and Asterisk is only doing the media function. We are talking about over 100 users. Is Freeswit

Re: [Freeswitch-users] Startup pointers

2008-04-16 Thread David Villasmil
Mike, Thank you for answering! Actually I went into the irc yesterday and got lots of help. It so happens that conf files were not put where they should've been by the installer (somehow). I did a make sync (I had the sources from two days ago) and re-did everything and its all A-OK now! I go

Re: [Freeswitch-users] [OpenSER-Users] FreeSWITCH and OpenSER

2008-04-16 Thread Mikael A. Bjerkeland
ons, 16.04.2008 kl. 11.35 +0300, skrev Juha Heinanen: > Mikael A. Bjerkeland writes: > > > All SIP traffic goes to the OpenSER proxy which in turn routes the call > > with the LCR module to a FreeSWITCH server. This has proven to work fine > > in my limited testing environment. I am using ENUM

[Freeswitch-users] FreeSWITCH and OpenSER

2008-04-16 Thread Mikael A. Bjerkeland
Hi, I am trying to look up information on the use of FreeSWITCH together with OpenSER. I am doing a configuration on my own without much experience on the configuration of OpenSER. In my setup OpensSER acts as a registrar and proxy. I have multiple FreeSWITCH servers for media, routing and PSTN te

Re: [Freeswitch-users] New feature - NAT handling, keep-alive OPTIONS

2008-04-16 Thread kokoska rokoska
Jonathan Palley napsal(a): > I get the feeling that some of these edge optimizations are, > rightfully, not the top priority for the core team. I think so. And this why I think about to do it myself :-) If someone other see it useful... > If you make > these changes I'm happy to help test a