Re: [Freeswitch-users] Unexpected acl behavior. Feature or bug?

2008-09-30 Thread Noah Silverman
That makes sense. However it might make sense for me to add something to the wiki about this. It isn't documented anywhere that an allow in the acl will bypass the directory and registration. On a separate topic, I was just reading a post of yours from February where you describe your LCR

Re: [Freeswitch-users] Unexpected acl behavior. Feature or bug?

2008-09-30 Thread Ken Rice
The software in question is a custom dialplan replacement module for freeswitch that is available for licensing... As far as the setup goes you set up the sip profiles as normal, ratedecks and other items are loaded into a DB and routing happens automagically... From: Noah Silverman [EMAIL

Re: [Freeswitch-users] get channel status

2008-09-30 Thread Gopal krishnan
Hi, Without the info itself I am able to get the Answer state and lots of varialbles, is it possible that I can get some variables via api? On Mon, Sep 29, 2008 at 11:38 PM, B Karthik [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Set hangup_after_bridge variable to false and run the info command after bridge,

Re: [Freeswitch-users] Load test - performance not even matching Asterisk

2008-09-30 Thread Jon Bruel
OK, you can access it directly now, and yes it would be fine if we can find out what's wrong once for all. Phone is: +45 45 16 1001. I'm on CET. Regarding the calling application: It is Asterisk, setting up one leg to MOH and the other to FS, so audio is certainly going through. Regarding the

Re: [Freeswitch-users] Unexpected acl behavior. Feature or bug?

2008-09-30 Thread Anthony Minessale
There is a separate apply-inbound-acl and apply-register-acl And yest the point of apply-inbound-acl is that all matches from that ip will be allowed in blindly. it's the opposite of doing Digest auth. There is still a way to associate an a ip range with a user so when you are let in over acl it

Re: [Freeswitch-users] Load test - performance not even matching Asterisk

2008-09-30 Thread Anthony Minessale
hopefully on 2 different servers? please send a private email with the box login credentials to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and we will contact you. On Tue, Sep 30, 2008 at 4:06 AM, Jon Bruel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: OK, you can access it directly now, and yes it would be fine if we can find out

Re: [Freeswitch-users] Default config changes

2008-09-30 Thread Thomas Mangin
Jeremy, Short answer: The commercial version of zoiper http://www.zoiper.com/ (30 euros) has the features you request listed but I only ever used their 'lite' version. Long answer: I found the 'lite' version on Leopard useful but it has is weirdness - some I would attribute to be a stripped

Re: [Freeswitch-users] get channel status

2008-09-30 Thread Baskar
Hi, I don't understand.could you please tell me in brief? . I want to check my channel status whether it is ringing or answer or hangup. On Mon, Sep 29, 2008 at 11:38 PM, B Karthik [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Set hangup_after_bridge variable to false and run the info command after bridge, you

Re: [Freeswitch-users] get channel status

2008-09-30 Thread Anthony Minessale
if you are using event_socket you can subscribe to the channel_state event and it will tell you every time the channel changes states. On Tue, Sep 30, 2008 at 1:29 AM, Baskar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, I don't understand.could you please tell me in brief? . I want to check my channel

[Freeswitch-users] Which version to run in production

2008-09-30 Thread Martin Joseph
HelloFreeSWITCHers, I am just curious as to which version of FS you all run on your in use servers? It seems like the SVN of trunk is being recommended to fix a lot of issues, but are people actually using trunk on customers servers? I am running 1.01 and haven't had issues with it, but

[Freeswitch-users] Update procedure

2008-09-30 Thread jflowers
I have a several weeks old freeswitch-snapshot installed on FreeBSD 6.2 that I would like to update and keep current with svn but I am unsure of the correct procedure. I checked out freeswitch trunk, ran bootstrap.sh, ./configure and make but am having second thoughts about running make install