Re: [Freeswitch-users] [OT] Re: Scanning my firewall for open UDP ports?

2009-12-19 Thread Jason White
Gabriel Gunderson wrote: > Funny that you assume his desktop is running Windows (maybe it is). I > would have guessed that the average person on this list doesn't run > Windows on the desktop. But, what do I know? Some of us on the list have never run Windows on anything. It's Debian on my d

[Freeswitch-users] [OT] Re: Scanning my firewall for open UDP ports?

2009-12-19 Thread Gabriel Gunderson
On Thu, Dec 17, 2009 at 6:14 AM, Hristo Benev wrote: > Just for your information there is a version of nmap for windows. So you can > do the test from your desktop. Funny that you assume his desktop is running Windows (maybe it is). I would have guessed that the average person on this list does

Re: [Freeswitch-users] Difference between ESL execute() andexecuteAsync()

2009-12-19 Thread Ron McLeod
Here's the ES network trace: Content-Length: 1502 Content-Type: text/event-plain Event-Name: CHANNEL_STATE Core-UUID: bb9ea62a-ed02-11de-91b1-8b7cb185f66f FreeSWITCH-Hostname: ron-laptop FreeSWITCH-IPv4: 192.168.100.132 FreeSWITCH-IPv6: %3A%3A1 Event-Date-Local: 2009-12-19%2019%3A12%3A09 Event-Dat

[Freeswitch-users] Difference between ESL execute() and executeAsync()

2009-12-19 Thread Ron McLeod
I don't notice any different in behavior between execute() and executeAsync(). I was expecting that executeAsync() would return right-away, and that execute() would only return after the specified application runs to completion (CHANNEL_EXECUTE_COMPLETE event). Running the sample app below, I see

Re: [Freeswitch-users] ACLs through proxy

2009-12-19 Thread Bill W.
Hey Metik, Yes. Well, actually, I can have the cidr in two places in the directory. >From what I understand the cidr= parmeter is used in conjunction with the apply-inbound-acl parameter in the sofia profile to just allow someone to make calls from a certain IP without authenticating

Re: [Freeswitch-users] Third Party device connectivity from Freeswitch

2009-12-19 Thread Frank Carmickle
On Sun, Dec 20, Scott Fernandez wrote: > Hi, > > Is there a way to have the Freeswitch to route the calls to physical > device/phone rather than just routing the calls to soft phones like Xlite?. Very much so. It all depends on what you want to do. > If available, What sort of settings that are

Re: [Freeswitch-users] Deleting event name in Filter

2009-12-19 Thread Ron McLeod
Would this work? $IVR->{_esl}->send("filter delete Event-Name CHANNEL_EXECUTE_COMPLETE"); Ron From: freeswitch-users-boun...@lists.freeswitch.org [mailto:freeswitch-users-boun...@lists.freeswitch.org] On Behalf Of Magesh R Sent: Friday, December 18,

[Freeswitch-users] Deleting event name in Filter

2009-12-19 Thread Magesh R
Dear All, I have filter a Event like the following in Perl. $IVR->{_esl}->filter("Event-Name","CHANNEL_EXECUTE_COMPLETE"); But I don't how to delete that filter by using filter method. Because 'filter' method accepts only two arguments. Could you any one tell me a way to do it? Thanks, Ma

[Freeswitch-users] Third Party device connectivity from Freeswitch

2009-12-19 Thread Scott Fernandez
Hi, Is there a way to have the Freeswitch to route the calls to physical device/phone rather than just routing the calls to soft phones like Xlite?. If available, What sort of settings that are required in Freeswitch to communicate with third party applications/hardwares (like PBX) so that the ca

Re: [Freeswitch-users] Park with Pre Answer

2009-12-19 Thread Ron McLeod
My issue has nothing to do with registration or authentication. I am simply looking for a way to park a new call without having the call "pre-answered" (I don't want a SIP 183 sent back to the client). Ron > -Original Message- > From: freeswitch-users-boun...@lists.freeswitch.org [mailto

Re: [Freeswitch-users] Park with Pre Answer

2009-12-19 Thread Frank Carmickle
Good afternoon By default the internal profile is looking to have authed calls. If you want you can set an acl. Look at autoload_configs/acl.conf.xml. Also remember to set the context in the profile so that the dialplan for that context will be parsed. If you decide to register to it you c

Re: [Freeswitch-users] Park with Pre Answer

2009-12-19 Thread Ron McLeod
This is what I am doing . DIALPLAN NETWORK TRACE 0.00 192.168.100.140 -> 192.168.100.132 SIP/SDP Request: INVITE sip:6042772...@192.168.100.132:5090, with session description 0.000749 192.168.100.132 -> 192.168.100.140 SIP Sta

Re: [Freeswitch-users] RTP problems in recent revisions?

2009-12-19 Thread Anthony Minessale
I tried a patch out of pure deduction and speculation from your post. Can you update and test it for me please? On Sat, Dec 19, 2009 at 9:19 AM, Anthony Minessale < anthony.miness...@gmail.com> wrote: > Also retest with no zrtp > send a full console debug log with sip trace > > On Dec 19, 2009 8

Re: [Freeswitch-users] ACLs through proxy

2009-12-19 Thread Metik
I noticed a typo in my post that may easily confuse someone... should be: -metik Metik wrote: > Bill, > > I think you would add this to the user profile in the directory. The > "brian.xml" example (located in ${confdir}/directory/) provided with the > default/sample configuration files de

Re: [Freeswitch-users] Allow/Deny REGISTER Request Based on User-Agent Header

2009-12-19 Thread Peter P GMX
we do this based XML-Curl. Jerry Richards schrieb: > Is it possible to allow/deny REGISTER requests based on the User-Agent > header? I need to know/manage what devices are registering. > > Best Regards, > Jerry > > > ___ > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list

Re: [Freeswitch-users] ACLs through proxy

2009-12-19 Thread Metik
Bill, I think you would add this to the user profile in the directory. The "brian.xml" example (located in ${confdir}/directory/) provided with the default/sample configuration files demonstrates how to to do this by introducing a "cidr" attribute to the the "user" element. Example:

Re: [Freeswitch-users] Park with Pre Answer

2009-12-19 Thread Anthony Minessale
how are you parking it? do you have a debug log showing it happen? On Fri, Dec 18, 2009 at 11:42 PM, Ron McLeod wrote: > Is there any way to park a channel without causing pre-answer (resulting > is a SIP 183 Session Progress)? > > > > Thanks, > > Ron > > ___

Re: [Freeswitch-users] RTP problems in recent revisions?

2009-12-19 Thread Anthony Minessale
Also retest with no zrtp send a full console debug log with sip trace On Dec 19, 2009 8:33 AM, "Michael Jerris" wrote: The best help to track this down is to try to identify the specific svn revision that caused the issue and to supply a full freeswitch debug with sip trace. Mike On Dec 19, 20

Re: [Freeswitch-users] RTP problems in recent revisions?

2009-12-19 Thread Michael Jerris
The best help to track this down is to try to identify the specific svn revision that caused the issue and to supply a full freeswitch debug with sip trace. Mike On Dec 19, 2009, at 3:31 AM, Jason White wrote: > Revision 15904 is fine, but after upgrading to revision 16003 I get > the > f

[Freeswitch-users] RTP problems in recent revisions?

2009-12-19 Thread Jason White
Revision 15904 is fine, but after upgrading to revision 16003 I get the following. 1. No problems with a FreeSWITCH to FreeSWITCH call (Celt codec). 2. A PCMU call to a SIP provider is fine for the first 20 to 30 seconds, then the audio breaks up completely. I have ZRTP compiled in, if that make