There are no legal uncertainties with respect to patents in GPL v3. You
cannot assert them in code you license under it. There was ambiguities
in GPL v2 in this respect which some companies liked. I prefer to deal
with honest companies rather than those that are anti-social or might
choose
SIP TLS will protect the SIP session information with static keys via a
certificate, assuming of course the call is direct between two peers.
It will do nothing for the actual voice channel.
There is SRTP, which can be used to create a cryptographic context over
RTP. However, the key question is
If I can find funding for travel presently I would.
Anthony Minessale wrote:
Hey David!
You should come by to this year's ClueCon!
We still have some speaking slots left.
On Thu, May 7, 2009 at 11:08 AM, David Sugar dy...@gnutelephony.org
mailto:dy...@gnutelephony.org wrote:
SIP
They require one use g.729, which is patent encumbered as well as rather
computationally intensive.
Dan wrote:
You probably already saw this but
http://www.skypeforsip.com/
Skype is supporting sip for business users.
Where this is distinguished, it is not directly at the level that user's
experience the end result.
In the case of what is called a softswitch, one answer is found in
organizations like the ISC (International Softswitch Consortium) and
vendors who built products around their architecture
You actually have potentially ~1320 effective SIP transactions per
second to support 4 registered ua's with a 60s refresh. This is
because the ua sends it's registration refresh unauthenticated. The
registrar will then push back an authentication challenge request so the
ua can prove its
I actually have found an alternate approach that we optionally use in
sipwitch. Basically, sipwitch can be set to recognize a trusted
subnet, and automatically accepts a refresh from any actively registered
ua on the trusted subnet(s) without requesting an authentication
challenge, so long as the
