[Freeswitch-users] Monitoring On-Hold/Off-Hold

2009-08-05 Thread mayamatakeshi
Hello, I'm using mod_event_socket to monitor FS. I'm using "events plain ALL' and I get lots of channel events. But curiously, when some channel puts the call on-hold/off-hold, I don't get any notification. Is it possible to get these events? Am I missing some setting? regards, takeshi __

Re: [Freeswitch-users] Monitoring On-Hold/Off-Hold

2009-08-06 Thread mayamatakeshi
2009/8/6 João Mesquita : > I only see one way out of this. If you manage presence, an event like the > following is sent: > > Event-Name: PRESENCE_IN > Core-UUID: 189b12c0-7fb0-11de-b0bc-37eec03ad00f > FreeSWITCH-Hostname: cl-t146-421cl > FreeSWITCH-IPv4: XX > FreeSWITCH-IPv6: %3A%3A1 > Event-D

Re: [Freeswitch-users] SIPGATE Problem

2009-08-18 Thread mayamatakeshi
On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 8:34 PM, NOx-WHV wrote: > > Hi, > > sorry - i have to ask again. This is my entry in > /conf/sip_profiles/external/ : > > > > > > > > > > > and it´s still the same... from: 2395...@139.13.37.160 > > Do you have another tip? I don't see where you are setting the para

Re: [Freeswitch-users] SIPGATE Problem

2009-08-18 Thread mayamatakeshi
On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 10:10 PM, NOx-WHV wrote: > > Hi, > > this is the text without brackets: > > include > gateway name="sipgate.de" > param name="username" value="2395805"/ > param name="from-domain" value="sipgate.de"/ > param name="password" value="abcde"/ > param name="proxy" value="sipgate.

Re: [Freeswitch-users] SIPp issues - seems FS doesn't understand ACK message

2009-08-24 Thread mayamatakeshi
On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 7:31 AM, Tihomir Culjaga wrote: > > sipp_cmd: sipp -sn uac 10.4.4.251 -sf uac_redirect.xml -s > 30003016094191500 -trace_err -r 1 -rp 1000 -trace_msg -inf test.txt -m 1 -l > 4000 > scenario file:  uac_redirect.xml > FS dialplan:   public.xml > SIP trace: 

Re: [Freeswitch-users] SIPp issues - seems FS doesn't understand ACK message

2009-08-24 Thread mayamatakeshi
On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 10:52 AM, mayamatakeshi wrote: > On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 7:31 AM, Tihomir Culjaga wrote: >> >> sipp_cmd: sipp -sn uac 10.4.4.251 -sf uac_redirect.xml -s >> 30003016094191500 -trace_err -r 1 -rp 1000 -trace_msg -inf test.txt -m 1 -l >

[Freeswitch-users] No NOTIFY MWI when registering via proxy.

2009-09-02 Thread mayamatakeshi
Hello, I'm testing FS support for the header Path (FS is behind opensips). It pretty much works: I tested calling from one user to the other and calls work perfectly. However, I've noticed that when I register my terminal directly with FS without going thru the proxy, I receive an unsolicited NOTIF

Re: [Freeswitch-users] No NOTIFY MWI when registering via proxy.

2009-09-02 Thread mayamatakeshi
On Wed, Sep 2, 2009 at 7:59 PM, mayamatakeshi wrote: > Hello, > I'm testing FS support for the header Path (FS is behind opensips). > It pretty much works: I tested calling from one user to the other and calls > work perfectly. > However, I've noticed that when I regi

Re: [Freeswitch-users] No NOTIFY MWI when registering via proxy.

2009-09-03 Thread mayamatakeshi
hanks. I've located the option in the mod sofia source: send-message-query-on-register It seems it is not in the wiki. I will update the mod sofia page. > On Sep 2, 2009 9:20 PM, "mayamatakeshi" wrote: > > > > On Wed, Sep 2, 2009 at 7:59 PM, mayamatakeshi > wrote:

Re: [Freeswitch-users] No NOTIFY MWI when registering via proxy.

2009-09-04 Thread mayamatakeshi
On Wed, Sep 2, 2009 at 7:59 PM, mayamatakeshi wrote: > Hello, > I'm testing FS support for the header Path (FS is behind opensips). > It pretty much works: I tested calling from one user to the other and calls > work perfectly. > However, I've noticed that when I regi

Re: [Freeswitch-users] No NOTIFY MWI when registering via proxy.

2009-09-04 Thread mayamatakeshi
On Fri, Sep 4, 2009 at 7:28 PM, mayamatakeshi wrote: > > On Wed, Sep 2, 2009 at 7:59 PM, mayamatakeshi wrote: > >> Hello, >> I'm testing FS support for the header Path (FS is behind opensips). >> It pretty much works: I tested calling from one user to the o

Re: [Freeswitch-users] auto expiration

2009-09-05 Thread mayamatakeshi
On Sun, Sep 6, 2009 at 12:13 AM, Woody Dickson wrote: > Hi, > > I would like to set up freeswitch to automatically expire a user > registration if either NOTIFY or REGISTER is not received within certain > time frame. > > Does anyone know how to do that? > I don't know about NOTIFY. But for REGIS

Re: [Freeswitch-users] No dial-string available error

2009-09-05 Thread mayamatakeshi
On Sat, Sep 5, 2009 at 5:36 PM, Juan Backson wrote: > Hi, > > I am getting no dial-string available error when using xml_odbc module to > bridge a call. How can I resolve this problem? > Hello, I never tried the mod_xml_odbc. But as the message says, you are not providing a dial-string. I belie

Re: [Freeswitch-users] No NOTIFY MWI when registering via proxy.

2009-09-11 Thread mayamatakeshi
On Sat, Sep 12, 2009 at 1:45 AM, Michael Jerris wrote: > Following up, did a bug get created for this issue? > Hello, yes. http://jira.freeswitch.org/browse/MODSOFIA-26 > > On Sep 5, 2009, at 2:40 AM, mayamatakeshi wrote: > > > On Fri, Sep 4, 2009 at 7:28 PM, mayamatake

Re: [Freeswitch-users] No NOTIFY MWI when registering via proxy.

2009-09-15 Thread mayamatakeshi
On 9/12/09, mayamatakeshi wrote: > > > On Sat, Sep 12, 2009 at 1:45 AM, Michael Jerris wrote: > >> Following up, did a bug get created for this issue? >> > > Hello, > yes. > http://jira.freeswitch.org/browse/MODSOFIA-26 > Just to simplify things in ca

Re: [Freeswitch-users] [Freeswitch-dev] FreeSWITCH Update: Valet Parking

2009-10-10 Thread mayamatakeshi
On Fri, Oct 9, 2009 at 10:42 AM, Michael Collins wrote: > FYI, > > The FreeSWITCH devs have added valet parking! Check it out: > http://www.freeswitch.org/node/207 > > Let us know what you think. > Very nice. But I think a valet_unpark app is missing. If the intention of the person sent to the

Re: [Freeswitch-users] [Freeswitch-dev] FreeSWITCH Update: Valet Parking

2009-10-10 Thread mayamatakeshi
On Sun, Oct 11, 2009 at 12:18 PM, mayamatakeshi wrote: > > > On Fri, Oct 9, 2009 at 10:42 AM, Michael Collins wrote: > >> FYI, >> >> The FreeSWITCH devs have added valet parking! Check it out: >> http://www.freeswitch.org/node/207 >> >> Let us

[Freeswitch-users] On-Hold takes 5 seconds

2008-06-26 Thread mayamatakeshi
Hello, I'm playing with FreeSwitch svn revision 8849. When I try to put an established call on hold (I'm using eyebeam), FreeSwitch takes 5 seconds to reply with 200 OK. This would not be a big problem by itself, but it seems this OnHold processing blocks the reply for all other incoming calls (or

Re: [Freeswitch-users] On-Hold takes 5 seconds

2008-06-27 Thread mayamatakeshi
Brian, thanks, it's fine now. On Sat, Jun 28, 2008 at 1:20 AM, Brian West <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Try anything after rev 8857 > /b > > On Jun 26, 2008, at 8:23 PM, mayamatakeshi wrote: > > Hello, > I'm playing with FreeSwitch svn revision 8849. >

[Freeswitch-users] Directory and UserAgent Registration

2008-08-06 Thread mayamatakeshi
Hello, I'm a little confused with FreeSWITCH behavior. At http://wiki.freeswitch.org/wiki/XML_User_Directory_Guide we can read: "The directory section is used to add accounts for all users that should be able to register in the pbx by using User Agents (SIP Phones)." So I suppose I should provide

Re: [Freeswitch-users] Directory and UserAgent Registration

2008-08-06 Thread mayamatakeshi
On Wed, Aug 6, 2008 at 4:42 PM, mayamatakeshi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote: > Hello, > I'm a little confused with FreeSWITCH behavior. > At http://wiki.freeswitch.org/wiki/XML_User_Directory_Guide > we can read: > "The directory section is used to add accounts for all

Re: [Freeswitch-users] Directory and UserAgent Registration

2008-08-06 Thread mayamatakeshi
gt; Could you please post a bug report of this on jira.freeswitch.org? This > is definitely not expected behavior, so if this is happening it should be > fixed. > > -Ray > > mayamatakeshi wrote: > > > > On Wed, Aug 6, 2008 at 4:42 PM, mayamatakeshi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]&g

[Freeswitch-users] Anonymous checkout

2008-08-07 Thread mayamatakeshi
Hello, I'm trying to update my sources, but now http://svn.freeswitch.org is asking for usr/pass. It never did this before. Is this on purpose? Should we register for them? Regards, Takeshi ___ Freeswitch-users mailing list Freeswitch-users@lists.freeswi

Re: [Freeswitch-users] Directory and UserAgent Registration

2008-08-07 Thread mayamatakeshi
e 'false' and not 'true' (that's the reason why the thing is commented in the sample file). I believe the correction mentioned by Brian also corrected that, as rev 9232 does honor the value set for accept-blind-reg and 'false' is assumed by default. So, case closed

Re: [Freeswitch-users] Anonymous checkout

2008-08-07 Thread mayamatakeshi
On Thu, Aug 7, 2008 at 9:49 PM, mayamatakeshi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote: > Hello, > I'm trying to update my sources, but now http://svn.freeswitch.org is > asking for usr/pass. It never did this before. > Is this on purpose? Should we register for them? > I don't k

Re: [Freeswitch-users] Mod_socket: custom caller sip domain in originate command

2009-10-26 Thread mayamatakeshi
On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 12:20 AM, Artem Shiyanov wrote: > Hi there! > > Please, suggest how to specify custom caller sip domain (logical) in > originate command. > I've been trying several alternatives but no one worked: > 1) specify full sip address in > origination_caller_id_number=1...@uat.pbx

[Freeswitch-users] Channel variables not being set when FS calls user

2009-10-28 Thread mayamatakeshi
Hello, in this page http://wiki.freeswitch.org/wiki/XML_User_Directory_Guide we can read: = Variables: Any variables defined in the domain or user will be defined as channel variables when there is a call to user or when there is an inbound calls from that user. ===

Re: [Freeswitch-users] Channel variables not being set when FS calls user

2009-10-28 Thread mayamatakeshi
that > user. > > /b > > On Oct 28, 2009, at 3:33 AM, mayamatakeshi wrote: > > > I can see the channel variables are set when there is an incoming > > call from the user, but not when FS sends a call to the user. >

[Freeswitch-users] No RTP destination auto-correction

2009-10-28 Thread mayamatakeshi
I'm seeing a strange issue with eyebeam behind NAT. If I make a call from eyebeam to FS, I can see FS receives packets from eyebeam's nat address (confirmed with tcpdump and mod_event_socket DTMF) but it doesn't change the RTP destination to the source of those packets and sends the packets to the

Re: [Freeswitch-users] No RTP destination auto-correction

2009-10-28 Thread mayamatakeshi
I'm really sorry, guys. I was just some revisions behind and forgot to make current and test before posting. It's fine now. Thank you. On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 1:51 AM, Brian West wrote: > have you updated to the latest SVN? > > /b > > On Oct 28, 2009, at 11:35 AM, mayam

[Freeswitch-users] ParkServer: how to publish orbit status

2009-11-07 Thread mayamatakeshi
Hello, it is my understanding that FreeSWITCH doesn't provide a ParkServer per se. So, to provide for this, I will have an entry in the dialplan to play MOH on the channel continuously till someone retrieve the call. And then, I need to publish a NOTIFY to all subscribed users informing the status

[Freeswitch-users] mod_fifo and multi-tenancy

2009-11-18 Thread mayamatakeshi
About mod_fifo, it would be safe to use it in multi-tenancy scenarios where domains are created and deleted all the time and in consequence, fifos are created all the time? I mean, fifos are eventually destroyed by mod_fifo itself. Is this correct? br, takeshi _

Re: [Freeswitch-users] mod_fifo and multi-tenancy

2009-11-18 Thread mayamatakeshi
On Thu, Nov 19, 2009 at 6:36 AM, Michael Collins wrote: > > > On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 8:32 AM, mayamatakeshi wrote: > >> About mod_fifo, it would be safe to use it in multi-tenancy scenarios >> where domains are created and deleted all the time and in consequence, fifo

Re: [Freeswitch-users] odbc FLAG_MULTI_STATMENTS

2009-12-04 Thread mayamatakeshi
I had this same problem today. I solved it using OPTION = 67108864 instead of OPTIONS = 67108864 I'm using CentOS5.3 (x86_64) br, takeshi On Sat, Nov 28, 2009 at 12:36 AM, Frank @ Impact wrote: > Yes. I am using version 5.1 I am using Fedora 12. > > > > -Original Message- > *From:* fr

[Freeswitch-users] Small delay in registration validity

2009-12-17 Thread mayamatakeshi
It seems to me, in previous revisions of FS, we could successfully call a registered user as soon as his terminal gets 200 OK for REGISTER. But after testing recent revisions, it seems we must wait a little (I wait 1 second) otherwise a call to bridge would end with this: 2009-12-17 22:46:14.15516

Re: [Freeswitch-users] Small delay in registration validity

2009-12-17 Thread mayamatakeshi
://wiki.freeswitch.org/wiki/Sofia.conf.xml#sql-in-transactions > On Thu, Dec 17, 2009 at 9:53 AM, mayamatakeshi wrote: > >> It seems to me, in previous revisions of FS, we could successfully call a >> registered user as soon as his terminal gets 200 OK for REGISTER. >> But af