I think thats a centos bug. Seen that often as well.
Am 23.04.2009 um 17:35 schrieb Fred-145:
Michael Jerris wrote:
It means the reason those directories where like that in the file
were
because they are based on the locations the rpm puts the files.
Thanks again Mike. I went ahead, crea
Michael Jerris wrote:
> It means the reason those directories where like that in the file were
> because they are based on the locations the rpm puts the files.
Thanks again Mike. I went ahead, created a "freeswitch" user, chowned
/usr/local/freeswitch/ recursively, ran /etc/init.d/freeswitch,
On Apr 22, 2009, at 5:34 AM, Fred-145 wrote:
>
>
> Michael Jerris wrote:
>> Those files in tree go with the rpm build with goes correctly to
>> those
>> directories.
>
> Thanks Mike, but I don't understand :-/
>
> Do you mean that I should not bother compiling from SVN and download
> an RPM
>
Michael Jerris wrote:
> Those files in tree go with the rpm build with goes correctly to those
> directories.
Thanks Mike, but I don't understand :-/
Do you mean that I should not bother compiling from SVN and download an RPM
instead (I didn't see a source listed under
http://wiki.freeswitch.
Those files in tree go with the rpm build with goes correctly to those
directories.
Mike
On Apr 21, 2009, at 4:06 AM, Fred-145 wrote:
>
> Hello
>
> I'm installing Freeswitch on a CentOS 5.3 test host. I noticed that
> the
> freeswitch.init.redhat contains paths that don't match a stock CentO
Hello
I'm installing Freeswitch on a CentOS 5.3 test host. I noticed that the
freeswitch.init.redhat contains paths that don't match a stock CentOS
install.
All files are currently installed/owned by root: Should I go ahead, create a
"freeswitch" user/group, and chown everything under /usr/local
