then you should be fine.. run the info app to make sure ;)
On Sep 25, 2008, at 1:22 PM, Noah Silverman wrote:
> OK,
>
> bind_reg not in my config file at all.
> auth_calls set to "true" for the default context.
>
>
> -N
>
___
Freeswitch-users mailing
OK,
bind_reg not in my config file at all.
auth_calls set to "true" for the default context.
-N
On Sep 25, 2008, at 1:10 PM, Brian West wrote:
If you have blind reg on and auth-calls set to false then you'll
still show up .. we have to challenge you for those setting to go
into effect.
If you have blind reg on and auth-calls set to false then you'll still
show up .. we have to challenge you for those setting to go into effect.
So double check the profile for auth-calls and accept-blind-reg.
/b
On Sep 25, 2008, at 1:07 PM, Noah Silverman wrote:
I thought I was.
If I do a
FYI,
Here is what I get from sofia status
Call-ID [EMAIL PROTECTED]
User[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Contact "user"
Agent Asterisk PBX
Status Registered(UDP-NAT)(unknown) EXP(2008-09-25 13:12:33)
On Sep 25, 2008, at 12:30 PM, Michael Collins wrote:
Ve
I thought I was.
If I do a "sofia status profile internal" I see myself registered
there...
How else can I be sure?
-N
On Sep 25, 2008, at 12:51 PM, Brian West wrote:
Yes that is if you're really authenticating ;)
/b
On Sep 25, 2008, at 12:46 PM, Noah Silverman wrote:
OK,
That make
Yes that is if you're really authenticating ;)
/b
On Sep 25, 2008, at 12:46 PM, Noah Silverman wrote:
> OK,
>
> That makes sense, BUT if the call is coming from a registered user
> why do I need to explicitly set it again. (If I dial a call from
> my Polycom phone registered with FS, shoul
OK,
That makes sense, BUT if the call is coming from a registered user why
do I need to explicitly set it again. (If I dial a call from my
Polycom phone registered with FS, shouldn't it know which user I am???)
Thanks,
-N
On Sep 25, 2008, at 12:23 PM, Anthony Minessale wrote:
those v
Very interesting! I noticed that there are three similarly-named apps on the
wiki that could use some love:
set_global
set_profile_var
set_user
Could someone in the know throw some light on these three? I'll be happy to
wikify anything that gets posted to the list.
-MC
On Thu, Sep 25, 2008 at 12:
those vars will only be set on calls that were authenticated with the user
in question
you can force the variables to be applied to any channel with the
put this right before the bridge line (assuming ${domain} is the domain that
user lives in:
On Thu, Sep 25, 2008 at 1:40 PM, Noah Silverman <
Hello,
I'm having trouble getting the accountcode variable to show up in the
CDR.
Also, the effective_caller_id_number isn't getting passed through to
the actual call. (Separate but possible related problem)
Calls are working, the CDR looks great, I just don't get these two
variables..
10 matches
Mail list logo
