[Freeswitch-users] Behavior of deflect

2008-11-19 Thread Andy Spitzer
Woof! When using "deflect" on an inbound answered call, I notice that the FS channel stays connected as long as the original call exists, and does not send a BYE to the original call even after receiving a NOTFIY with a final response fragment. In addition, while FS gets those NOTIFY's, I haven

Re: [Freeswitch-users] Behavior of deflect

2008-11-19 Thread Anthony Minessale
try latest code and see how that works. I also added api command "uuid_deflect sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED]<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>" that should reply with the sipfrag. also it sets sip_refer_reply var to the sipfrag on the channel. On Wed, Nov 19, 2008 at 11:57 AM, Andy Spitzer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote

Re: [Freeswitch-users] Behavior of deflect

2008-11-20 Thread Andy Spitzer
Woof! Thanks for the changes! On Wed, 19 Nov 2008 21:09:19 -0500, Anthony Minessale <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > try latest code and see how that works. FreeSWITCH Version 1.0.trunk (10481) No difference with just "deflect"--the call does not clear when the REFER is completed, nor are there a

Re: [Freeswitch-users] Behavior of deflect

2008-11-20 Thread Anthony Minessale
the seg was a typo (resolved) how were you calling the deflect the way that had no change? every time i tried it sofia has taken down the channel once it completed. On Thu, Nov 20, 2008 at 1:16 PM, Andy Spitzer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Woof! > > Thanks for the changes! > > On Wed, 19 Nov 2

Re: [Freeswitch-users] Behavior of deflect

2008-11-20 Thread Andy Spitzer
Woof! On Thu, 20 Nov 2008 15:14:52 -0500, Anthony Minessale <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > how were you calling the deflect the way that had no change? > every time i tried it sofia has taken down the channel once it completed. Hmm... dialplan: Call from "207" to "[EMAIL P

Re: [Freeswitch-users] Behavior of deflect

2008-11-20 Thread Anthony Minessale
how about the uuid_deflect with latest? On Thu, Nov 20, 2008 at 2:33 PM, Andy Spitzer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Woof! > > On Thu, 20 Nov 2008 15:14:52 -0500, Anthony Minessale < > [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > how were you calling the deflect the way that had no change? > > every time i tri

Re: [Freeswitch-users] Behavior of deflect

2008-11-20 Thread Anthony Minessale
I wonder if sofia is not matching the notify to the dialog so we are not associating it with the channel. I know for a fact sofia tears it down for us when it gets the notify. do you have x-lite/eyebeam? When i was testing I called into park ext with fs and did show channels uuid_deflect sip:[EM

Re: [Freeswitch-users] Behavior of deflect

2008-11-21 Thread Andy Spitzer
Woof! On Thu, 20 Nov 2008 19:06:09 -0500, Anthony Minessale <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I wonder if sofia is not matching the notify to the dialog so we are not > associating it with the channel. > I know for a fact sofia tears it down for us when it gets the notify. > > do you have x-lite/eyebe

Re: [Freeswitch-users] Behavior of deflect

2008-11-21 Thread Anthony Minessale
I asked because I was wondering if you could test the scenario I described to compare what happens to a call from x-lite being deflected since I know for a fact it was working. On Fri, Nov 21, 2008 at 9:42 AM, Andy Spitzer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Woof! > > On Thu, 20 Nov 2008 19:06:09 -050

Re: [Freeswitch-users] Behavior of deflect

2008-11-21 Thread Andy Spitzer
Woof! On Thu, 20 Nov 2008 19:06:09 -0500, Anthony Minessale <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > When i was testing I called into park ext with fs and did > show channels > uuid_deflect > sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED]<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > and when it sends me the notify the command returns and prints the sipf

Re: [Freeswitch-users] Behavior of deflect

2008-11-21 Thread Anthony Minessale
can you try uuid_deflect again on latest, I see we give up to easy, "on 180 instead of final response in sipfrag" the one i tested didnt send 180 so i forgot about the possibility. post a full console debug with TPORT_LOG=1 if it doesnt work On Fri, Nov 21, 2008 at 10:21 AM, Andy Spitzer <[EMAIL

Re: [Freeswitch-users] Behavior of deflect

2008-11-21 Thread Andy Spitzer
Woof! On Fri, 21 Nov 2008 14:49:35 -0500, Anthony Minessale <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > can you try uuid_deflect again on latest, Done. > I see we give up to easy, "on 180 instead of final response in sipfrag" > the one i tested didnt send 180 so i forgot about the possibility. > > post a full

Re: [Freeswitch-users] Behavior of deflect

2008-11-21 Thread Andy Spitzer
Woof! Anthony wrote: > I asked because I was wondering if you could test the scenario I described to > compare what happens to a call from x-lite being deflected since I know for a > fact it was working. Woof wrote: > FS still doesn't hangup on the original call after the REFER is completed. I

Re: [Freeswitch-users] Behavior of deflect

2008-11-21 Thread Anthony Minessale
appears there are some cases it does not hangup. I added code to hangup for you if final response is 200 OK in latest with cause code BLIND_TRANSFER On Fri, Nov 21, 2008 at 2:30 PM, Andy Spitzer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Woof! > > Anthony wrote: > > I asked because I was wondering if you coul

Re: [Freeswitch-users] Behavior of deflect

2008-11-22 Thread Anthony Minessale
on a side note. Someone submitted a patch (and I added it to tree yesterday) to fire a custom sofia event on notify in reply to refer so you also have that to use as well. On Fri, Nov 21, 2008 at 2:54 PM, Anthony Minessale < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > appears there are some cases it does not ha