Andres,
OpenSIP's works very well as a load balancer. You could also use DNS SRV
(if the clients support it), round robin DNS
Really just depends on what you are trying to accomplish.
SDR
___
Freeswitch-users mailing list
Freeswitch-users@lists.f
openser/kamailio/ser/opensips you pick a name
DNS SRV
On Tue, Jul 7, 2009 at 16:29, Andres Gomez wrote:
> Hello to all
>
> Exist any solution to clustering. Any load balancing appliance o heartbeat
> test?.
>
> Regards
>
> Andres Gomez.
>
> ___
> Free
Hello to all
Exist any solution to clustering. Any load balancing appliance o heartbeat
test?.
Regards
Andres Gomez.
___
Freeswitch-users mailing list
Freeswitch-users@lists.freeswitch.org
http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
U
Hi,
Sorry for jumping in without reading the whole thread correctly but I
will most likely not have the time to do so before Saturday but would
still provide some feedback.
When using Openser as a customer phone proxy, it is my understanding
that unless you use the PATH extension you will h
Marc,
I'll chime in since I'm currently in the process of building a very
similar environment...
I currently have two FS boxes using xml_curl for configuration,
dialplan, and directory data. All sip session info and voicemail data is
stored in the mysql db which is on two multi-master mysql boxes
s... That
> adds another failure point and yet another set of boxes that end up needing
> to be redundant
>
>
> --
> *From: *Anthony Minessale <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> *Reply-To: *
> *Date: *Wed, 29 Oct 2008 21:55:46 -0500
> *To: *
>
]>
> Organization: Avvatel Corporation
> Reply-To:
> Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2008 19:10:32 -0700
> To:
> Subject: Re: [Freeswitch-users] Clustering FreeSWITCH
>
>
> I actually spent a big chunk of today doing various tests. Freeswitch is
> doing all the right things in thi
atel Corporation
> *Reply-To: *
> *Date: *Wed, 29 Oct 2008 19:10:32 -0700
> *To: *
> *Subject: *Re: [Freeswitch-users] Clustering FreeSWITCH
>
> I actually spent a big chunk of today doing various tests. Freeswitch is
> doing all the right things in this scenario. The problem
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Organization: Avvatel Corporation
Reply-To:
Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2008 19:10:32 -0700
To:
Subject: Re: [Freeswitch-users] Clustering FreeSWITCH
I actually spent a big chunk of today doing various tests. Freeswitch is
doing all the right things in this scenario. The problem ac
I actually spent a big chunk of today doing various tests. Freeswitch
is doing all the right things in this scenario. The problem actually
turns out to be my router/firewall that I'm testing behind. When the
phones register, it only opens up the port back from the IP address of
the server it
I'll have to 100% disagree with this statement.
NAPTR and SRV are how it should always be done. Toss in some GEO dns
and you have many of the problems solved. SRV records should never be
optional they should be required to function properly. The NATPR
records order preference of records
I assume the problem you asked about it happening because the client is disregarding the INVITE from a server with an IP address it was not registered to. If you try to capture the packets going out of your FS (or packets coming in your phone client), I bet you'll see the INVITE request, but no ac
This all seems right and would make a great wiki page.
What you have described *should* work.
when a phone registers try doing
sofia_contact <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
from the cli on each box and see what you get.
you can also use this function in the dialpan
${sofia_contact([EMAIL PROTECTED])}
check
I am in the process of making my FreeSWITCH installation highly
available and I'm running into a couple of snags that was hoping that
someone may have some insight on.
First, the setup as it is now.
There are two installations of FS on two different servers, lets call
them fs1 and fs2. They
14 matches
Mail list logo
