Kewl you can contribute via http://jira.freeswitch.org ;)
/b
On Mar 5, 2009, at 9:41 AM, Cameron Sorlie wrote:
> In a sense, you might say I did futz with mod_vmd ... to create
> mod_vad. There appeared to be just no (easy) way to modify the
> internal VAD code in the FreeSWITCH core (see s
In a sense, you might say I did futz with mod_vmd ... to create mod_vad.
There appeared to be just no (easy) way to modify the internal VAD code in
the FreeSWITCH core (see switch_rtp.c) to identify the origins of voice
activity. And rather than build into mod_vmd, which is a special purpose
tool,
Woof!
On Mon, 02 Mar 2009 19:32:53 -0500, Steve Underwood wrote:
I just had a look through that patent. Its amazing. There is a lot of
> focussed descriptive text, but a patent only really consists of its
> claims. Those claims are astonishingly open-ended, and characterise what
> people had be
Andy Spitzer wrote:
> Woof!
>
> On Sun, 01 Mar 2009 21:28:18 -0500, Brian West wrote:
>
>
>> NO. You want something that people THINK exists and works well...
>> Reliable human/voice detection doesn't exist in ANY form.
>>
>
> I beg to differ. See http://www.freepatentsonline.com/5521967
Hi,
mod_vmd is a bit more sophisticated than that. It looks for the signal
being narrowband energy. However, mod_vmd isn't very reliable, as it
takes a rather high SNR for its narrowband detector to work. So high
that a lossy codec like G.711 can barely manage it.
Regards,
Steve
Anthony Mines
Andy Spitzer wrote:
> Woof!
>
> On Sun, 01 Mar 2009 21:28:18 -0500, Brian West wrote:
>
>
>> NO. You want something that people THINK exists and works well...
>> Reliable human/voice detection doesn't exist in ANY form.
>>
>
> I beg to differ. See http://www.freepatentsonline.com/5521967
On Mon, Mar 2, 2009 at 11:48 AM, Anthony Minessale
wrote:
> i think that's what mod_vmd does
>
I think that's right. It just does the opposite - instead of looking
for differing power levels it looks for the same power level. In other
words it tries to detect distinctly non-human sound. I'll bet y
i think that's what mod_vmd does
On Mon, Mar 2, 2009 at 11:16 AM, Andy Spitzer wrote:
> Woof!
>
> On Sun, 01 Mar 2009 21:28:18 -0500, Brian West
> wrote:
>
> > NO. You want something that people THINK exists and works well...
> > Reliable human/voice detection doesn't exist in ANY form.
>
> I
Woof!
On Sun, 01 Mar 2009 21:28:18 -0500, Brian West wrote:
> NO. You want something that people THINK exists and works well...
> Reliable human/voice detection doesn't exist in ANY form.
I beg to differ. See http://www.freepatentsonline.com/5521967.html for one way
to do it. It works rathe
ignore_early_media=true is not going to do the trick since once the IVR
picks up the call on leg A, the ring tone is stopped and the IVR is going to
play pre-recorded voice menu. And the freeswtich is going to send DTMF to
reach a certain extension number say 101. Then the ring tone is going to
sta
Usually ringing is done in early media... so the best bet would be to
ignore_early_media=true
/b
On Mar 1, 2009, at 9:05 PM, Henry Huang wrote:
Well, I knew it would be some future fantasy for now..
If not human detection. I guess will try to use Dialplan Tools wait
for silence to wait til
Well, I knew it would be some future fantasy for now..
If not human detection. I guess will try to use Dialplan Tools wait for
silence to wait till the ring tone is finished ,then connect the other leg.
On Sun, Mar 1, 2009 at 6:28 PM, Brian West wrote:
> NO. You want something that people
NO. You want something that people THINK exists and works well...
Reliable human/voice detection doesn't exist in ANY form.
/b
On Mar 1, 2009, at 8:20 PM, Henry Huang wrote:
> Does the freeswitch VAD is able to distinguish ring tone from human
> voice?
> The scenario is to originate a call
Does the freeswitch VAD is able to distinguish ring tone from human voice?
The scenario is to originate a call to a IVR system(don't connect the other
leg here yet) and dial DTMF to get to the designated extension number , once
someone picks up and say hello ( detected by VAD) now release to connec
If i'm not mistaken those events will have a member-id in them so you
can tell who they belong to.
/b
On Mar 1, 2009, at 12:01 PM, Cameron Sorlie wrote:
> Using voice activity detection (VAD) in FreeSWITCH, how might I then
> distinguish which side of a call any given TALK or NOTALK event
Using voice activity detection (VAD) in FreeSWITCH, how might I then
distinguish which side of a call any given TALK or NOTALK event relates
to? I am interested not just that there is activity on the call, but
interested also in which party on the call is speaking (or not).
Cam
16 matches
Mail list logo
