Re: [Freeswitch-users] Downloaded tar vs latest SVN - 200 OK has more headers

2009-10-26 Thread Brian West
No you can't remove them... And they are 100% valid so your SBC is in the wrong. /b On Oct 26, 2009, at 12:05 AM, Ujjval Karihaloo wrote: Hi, I used the downlaoded TAR ball and my calls worked, however, when upgrading to the SVN release...my SBC is rejecting the 200 OK (when the FS

Re: [Freeswitch-users] Downloaded tar vs latest SVN - 200 OK has more headers

2009-10-26 Thread Kristian Kielhofner
Brian, This bothers me a bit. Of course they are valid. Anything prefixed with X- should be ignored by the remote end unless they are specifically looking for it. However: 1) We all know that just because the spec says they are valid doesn't make it so with every vendor. 2) As long as

Re: [Freeswitch-users] Downloaded tar vs latest SVN - 200 OK has more headers

2009-10-26 Thread Anthony Minessale
The headers are used to pass the callee-id info back to the other side so you have the id of who you called. The standards have failed us in this case as everything does it differently to the point that there is no standard thus we have invented our own way to carry this across from one FreeSWITCH

Re: [Freeswitch-users] Downloaded tar vs latest SVN - 200 OK has more headers

2009-10-26 Thread Kristian Kielhofner
Anthony, So if I'm understanding you correctly, if you are always using FreeSWITCH as an edge to other systems you should be able to safely disable these headers? On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 11:41 AM, Anthony Minessale anthony.miness...@gmail.com wrote: The headers are used to pass the callee-id

Re: [Freeswitch-users] Downloaded tar vs latest SVN - 200 OK has more headers

2009-10-26 Thread Tihomir Culjaga
On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 4:41 PM, Anthony Minessale anthony.miness...@gmail.com wrote: The headers are used to pass the callee-id info back to the other side so you have the id of who you called. The standards have failed us in this case as everything does it differently to the point that

Re: [Freeswitch-users] Downloaded tar vs latest SVN - 200 OK has more headers

2009-10-26 Thread Anthony Minessale
Thus perpetuating the wild-west of sip where you can't do anything according to spec because you have to worry about stupid things not keeping up. Sounds like the education system where I live too. I'll see what I can do. It's always the other end that ppl pay for that drive the free stuff

Re: [Freeswitch-users] Downloaded tar vs latest SVN - 200 OK has more headers

2009-10-26 Thread Anthony Minessale
This is ridiculous but here it is try r15230 add the profile param param name=pass-callee-id value=false/ On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 11:16 AM, Anthony Minessale anthony.miness...@gmail.com wrote: Thus perpetuating the wild-west of sip where you can't do anything according to spec because

Re: [Freeswitch-users] Downloaded tar vs latest SVN - 200 OK has more headers

2009-10-26 Thread Michael Jerris
New sofia profile param as follows: !-- set this param to false if your gateway for some reason hates X- headers that is is supposed to ignore-- !--param name=pass-callee-id value=false/-- On Oct 26, 2009, at 12:16 PM, Anthony Minessale wrote: Thus perpetuating the wild-west of sip

Re: [Freeswitch-users] Downloaded tar vs latest SVN - 200 OK has more headers

2009-10-26 Thread Kristian Kielhofner
It is ridiculous but thank you very much! On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 2:26 PM, Anthony Minessale anthony.miness...@gmail.com wrote: This is ridiculous but here it is try r15230 add the profile param param name=pass-callee-id value=false/ -- Kristian Kielhofner http://www.astlinux.org

Re: [Freeswitch-users] Downloaded tar vs latest SVN - 200 OK has more headers

2009-10-26 Thread Tihomir Culjaga
On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 7:26 PM, Anthony Minessale anthony.miness...@gmail.com wrote: This is ridiculous but here it is try r15230 add the profile param param name=pass-callee-id value=false/ sorry for that but, this will save you a lot of e-mail explaining why calls are not going

[Freeswitch-users] Downloaded tar vs latest SVN - 200 OK has more headers

2009-10-25 Thread Ujjval Karihaloo
Hi, I used the downlaoded TAR ball and my calls worked, however, when upgrading to the SVN release...my SBC is rejecting the 200 OK (when the FS answers the call - using Conferencing app).. Here are teh bad and good 200 OKI see a lot of additional headers startin gwith X:FS , can I