Yes, I've seen this http://wiki.freeswitch.org/wiki/SIP_TLS.
I was just curious if the only way to have true end to end secure
communications with FS would have to be a SIP trunk from one FS system to
another encrypted SIP system on the other with no POTS/PRI/BRI circuits used in
transit. I'm
Well its not so easy to take a lineman's handset and eavesdrop on a T1/
BRI/PRI/DSS1 circuit.. that takes way more hardware but POTS you
just need a lineman's handset.
But yes true secure will need to be end to end.
/b
On May 7, 2009, at 10:35 AM, Paul wrote:
Yes, I've seen this
: Brian West br...@freeswitch.org
To: freeswitch-users@lists.freeswitch.org
Sent: Thursday, May 7, 2009 11:43:53 AM
Subject: Re: [Freeswitch-users] FS + encryption
Well its not so easy to take a lineman's handset and eavesdrop on a
T1/BRI/PRI/DSS1 circuit.. that takes way more hardware but POTS
SIP TLS will protect the SIP session information with static keys via a
certificate, assuming of course the call is direct between two peers.
It will do nothing for the actual voice channel.
There is SRTP, which can be used to create a cryptographic context over
RTP. However, the key question is
Hey David!
You should come by to this year's ClueCon!
We still have some speaking slots left.
On Thu, May 7, 2009 at 11:08 AM, David Sugar dy...@gnutelephony.org wrote:
SIP TLS will protect the SIP session information with static keys via a
certificate, assuming of course the call is direct
If I can find funding for travel presently I would.
Anthony Minessale wrote:
Hey David!
You should come by to this year's ClueCon!
We still have some speaking slots left.
On Thu, May 7, 2009 at 11:08 AM, David Sugar dy...@gnutelephony.org
mailto:dy...@gnutelephony.org wrote:
SIP
