thx Brian.
On Fri, Mar 6, 2009 at 5:40 PM, Brian West wrote:
> latest SVN is what I would give a try.
>
> /b
>
> On Mar 6, 2009, at 1:37 PM, Pablo Hernan Saro wrote:
>
>> Thanks for your answer Michael.
>> What do you recommend for production environments: the latest SVN or
>> 1.0.3 tarball?
>>
latest SVN is what I would give a try.
/b
On Mar 6, 2009, at 1:37 PM, Pablo Hernan Saro wrote:
> Thanks for your answer Michael.
> What do you recommend for production environments: the latest SVN or
> 1.0.3 tarball?
>
> Pablo
___
Freeswitch-users m
Thanks for your answer Michael.
What do you recommend for production environments: the latest SVN or
1.0.3 tarball?
Pablo
On Fri, Mar 6, 2009 at 4:31 PM, Michael Collins wrote:
>> The FS log does not report anything abnormal. I'm running FS svn rev 11279.
>> Does anyone know what could happened?
> The FS log does not report anything abnormal. I'm running FS svn rev 11279.
> Does anyone know what could happened?
Well, you're about 1200 revs behind current SVN. A lot has been
improved in the past month or two, so definitely get yourself to the
latest SVN.
-MC
_
Hi there,
A few minutes ago, one of my FS servers crashed during normal usage
(no heavy load). The hardware is Dell 1950, if you need further
details please let me know.
What I found on my /var/log/messages is the following:
Mar 6 14:30:49 konference01 kernel: freeswitch[23798] general
protectio
