Re: [Freeswitch-users] Freeswitch with APR

2009-05-29 Thread Gopalakrishnan A.N
Ok Thanks Mike. I hope in asterisk it is not there. I was trying some couple of things, 1. when I use Java servlet to dial a call thru asterisk using manager interface it slows down. 2. when I use the same Java servlet with Freeswitch I feel the speed and usage in the tomcat. Its bit faster for

Re: [Freeswitch-users] Freeswitch with APR

2009-05-29 Thread Anthony Minessale
There is a very long explanation as to the differences behind asterisk AMI and FreeSWITCH Event Socket that I will not get into now but it's not related to APR or TCP socket performance whatsoever it's more about asynchronous versus monolithic modeling. On Fri, May 29, 2009 at 4:42 AM,

[Freeswitch-users] Freeswitch with APR

2009-05-28 Thread Gopalakrishnan A.N
Hi, I saw the apache portable runtime is included in freeswitch. So far I understand that using APR will give good performance. Am I correct? or it has been used for some other scenarios like even socket or dialplan? -- Thank you with regards, Gopal,

Re: [Freeswitch-users] Freeswitch with APR

2009-05-28 Thread Michael Jerris
apr is used primarily for portability and utility, not performance. It is used heavily throughout the entire codebase in the core and all modules (via our abstraction layer). On May 28, 2009, at 10:14 AM, Gopalakrishnan A.N wrote: Hi, I saw the apache portable runtime is included in