Re: [Freeswitch-users] HA clustering solution?

2008-09-01 Thread EdPimentl
Service Provider Self healing ha-cluster can and are being manage with the following tools: 1- NGINX or POUND or PERLBAL or HAProxy for LBS 2- WackaMole/Spread . For DNS / FOS 3- PUPPET / RPATH.. Rapid System Build 4- GroundWork/Hyperic for Network Management/System Management/Apps 5- XMPP

Re: [Freeswitch-users] HA clustering solution?

2008-09-01 Thread RR
> > Wow, this has turned into quite a debate. > > I think HA could be the killer app that catapults FS into the > mainstream. Even if not full implemented today, laying the groundwork > to allow for call state synchronization with a standby box would be a > great leap ahead of any other platform I'

[Freeswitch-users] HA clustering solution?

2008-08-28 Thread Jon Bruel
Hi everyone, I would like to join the choir of Tom Warren: HA with state synchronisation would not just be a killer, it will pave the road for the FreeSWITH all the way to the entrance of the Telco's. As a former co-owner of a hosted PBX Telco, I would like to share my experience about customers:

Re: [Freeswitch-users] HA clustering solution?

2008-08-27 Thread Tom Warren
Wow, this has turned into quite a debate. I think HA could be the killer app that catapults FS into the mainstream. Even if not full implemented today, laying the groundwork to allow for call state synchronization with a standby box would be a great leap ahead of any other platform I'm aware of.

Re: [Freeswitch-users] HA clustering solution?

2008-08-27 Thread James Green
Łukasz Zwierko wrote: > External monitoring would be better, system might hang up, interface > could remain up. Wherein lay an additional problem. Should the system be under severe load, the "system" may appear to hang, indeed become unreachable temporarily. Do you remove the host or check for a f

Re: [Freeswitch-users] HA clustering solution?

2008-08-27 Thread Łukasz Zwierko
W dniu 27 sierpnia 2008 14:46 użytkownik James Green <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> napisał: > Łukasz Zwierko wrote: >> OSPF what? What I am talking about was to have TWO FS machines runnig >> in active- standby mode, without having this configuration displayed >> to users. Simplest solution for that is havin

Re: [Freeswitch-users] HA clustering solution?

2008-08-27 Thread James Green
Łukasz Zwierko wrote: > OSPF what? What I am talking about was to have TWO FS machines runnig > in active- standby mode, without having this configuration displayed > to users. Simplest solution for that is having the same virtual IP on > both boxes, and directing the traffic to only one of them. O

Re: [Freeswitch-users] HA clustering solution?

2008-08-27 Thread Łukasz Zwierko
W dniu 27 sierpnia 2008 13:48 użytkownik James Green <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> napisał: > Łukasz Zwierko wrote: >> Hi, Regarding HA, I don't suppose you'll be able to go without any >> front-end, beacuse of IP-connectivity reasons, if you plan to work in >> active-standby mode . Active box needs to have

Re: [Freeswitch-users] HA clustering solution?

2008-08-27 Thread James Green
Łukasz Zwierko wrote: > Hi, Regarding HA, I don't suppose you'll be able to go without any > front-end, beacuse of IP-connectivity reasons, if you plan to work in > active-standby mode . Active box needs to have an unique IP, otherwise > each client will have to have 2 (or more) IP addresses config

Re: [Freeswitch-users] HA clustering solution?

2008-08-27 Thread Łukasz Zwierko
Hi, Regarding HA, I don't suppose you'll be able to go without any front-end, beacuse of IP-connectivity reasons, if you plan to work in active-standby mode . Active box needs to have an unique IP, otherwise each client will have to have 2 (or more) IP addresses configured. As solution you can use

Re: [Freeswitch-users] HA clustering solution?

2008-08-27 Thread James Green
Tom, Configuration: that should be easy using XML CURL to load what would otherwise be in the conf/ XML files. I would strongly recommend looking at this. Call state I wouldn't like to comment on, I have not looked into it. I would imagine it's unlikely to succeed based on the uuid of each call o

Re: [Freeswitch-users] HA clustering solution?

2008-08-26 Thread Tom Warren
Hi James, I'd like to avoid front-ending the FS boxes and instead have them load-share amongst themselves or sit in a hot/standby arrangement while updating the other box(es) with call state and configuration changes. They would be connected directly via a closed tertiary network so that the heart

Re: [Freeswitch-users] HA clustering solution?

2008-08-26 Thread James Green
Tom Warren wrote: > I'd like to know if there is any plan for an HA solution for > FreeSWITCH. I know the 'heartbeat' trick, but is there or will there > be any way to mirror the configuration changes and even call state > between two boxes in a sort of clustered arrangement? I don't think there's

[Freeswitch-users] HA clustering solution?

2008-08-25 Thread Tom Warren
Hi everyone, this is my first post. I'd like to know if there is any plan for an HA solution for FreeSWITCH. I know the 'heartbeat' trick, but is there or will there be any way to mirror the configuration changes and even call state between two boxes in a sort of clustered arrangement? Thanks, T