1950s with
> >> > Dual
> >> > QuadCore 2Ghz E5335's w/ 4Gs of ram. (admittedly this is a slightly
> >> > different method from what you are doing) in our configuration we are
> >> > able
> >> > route in excess of 200 calls/sec with a
ts in the Calls/Sec luckily FreeSwitch has a
>> > Sessions/Second Limiter built in and we can set this and keep the box
>> > from
>> > melting down.
>> >
>> > Please Note in the above configuration we are largely routing autodialer
>> > traffic so
Reply-To:
>> Date: Fri, 30 May 2008 11:42:40 +0500
>> To:
>> Subject: Re: [Freeswitch-users] Max of 170 channels in the conference room.
>>
>> 170 is an super impressive number at any rate!
>
> Pardon my lack of knowledge
>> on S
The only problem with this is most providers want inband or rfc2833
> From: "Faraz R. Khan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Organization: Emergen Consulting Pvt Ltd
> Reply-To:
> Date: Fri, 30 May 2008 11:42:40 +0500
> To:
> Subject: Re: [Freeswitch-users] Max of 1
much better if you decrease
> the calls per
> > second and increase the average call length. High Call Per
> Second Rates are
> > the bane of any switch
> >
> > K
> >
> >
>
t; from
> > melting down.
> >
> > Please Note in the above configuration we are largely routing autodialer
> > traffic so performace should be much better if you decrease the calls per
> > second and increase the average call length. High Call Per Second Rates
> are
&g
tes are
> the bane of any switch
>
> K
>
>
>
>
>> From: Nicolas Brenner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> Reply-To:
>> Date: Thu, 29 May 2008 12:54:07 -0400
>> To:
>> Subject: Re: [Freeswitch-users] Max of 170 channels in the conference room.
>>
>&
On Thu, 2008-05-29 at 14:14 -0400, Johny Kadarisman wrote:
> Hmm... pretty strange, I change grub menu.lst, and pass 'noht'
> but, it still showing the 2 'fake' cpu's.
>
Try "ht=off"
There are a couple of kernel cmdline params which differ slightly
between 32 and 64 bit versions.
_
enner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Reply-To:
> Date: Thu, 29 May 2008 12:54:07 -0400
> To:
> Subject: Re: [Freeswitch-users] Max of 170 channels in the conference room.
>
> Hi, sorry for my ignorance, but I was wondering if these figures are
> in any way comparable to t
The conference is more resource intensive than normal bridging but the
general rule for media channels is about 190 channels (95 bridges) per 1
gigahertz of CPU on a 64 bit platform. If you don't need to run media into
FS you can bet on a lot more.
On Thu, May 29, 2008 at 11:54 AM, Nicolas Bren
Hmm... pretty strange, I change grub menu.lst, and pass 'noht'
but, it still showing the 2 'fake' cpu's.
On Thu, May 29, 2008 at 1:30 PM, Brian West <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> the 'noht' argument to the kernel params.
>
> /b
>
> On May 29, 2008, at 12:24 PM, Johny Kadarisman wrote:
> > Yea, se
the 'noht' argument to the kernel params.
/b
On May 29, 2008, at 12:24 PM, Johny Kadarisman wrote:
> Yea, seems like a pretty old machine. and I thought it was at least
> a dual core thou :(
> I couldn't find a way turn hyperthreading off during boot time yet,
> If I do, will report back if i
Yea, seems like a pretty old machine. and I thought it was at least a dual
core thou :(
I couldn't find a way turn hyperthreading off during boot time yet, If I do,
will report back if it does some improvment.
btw, How do you know if this is hyperthread processor from cpuinfo?
Rgds,
Johny K.
On
Hi, sorry for my ignorance, but I was wondering if these figures are
in any way comparable to the performance FS would have doing bridged
calls?
I have a web callback app that's currently running on top of Asterisk,
and I'm planning on moving to FS, and use originate/&bridge commands
to bridge cal
These aren't really dual core CPU's they are single core with hyper-
threading. If you disable hyper-threading you'll get more performance.
You'll never get that great of performance out of these CPU's. The
new 64bit woodcrest/clovertown Xeon's are much better... night and day
difference.
Hi Brian, attached is my cpu info.
Rgds,
processor : 0
vendor_id : GenuineIntel
cpu family : 15
model : 2
model name : Intel(R) Xeon(TM) CPU 2.80GHz
stepping: 9
cpu MHz : 2784.780
cache size : 512 KB
physical id : 0
sibling
Can you cat /proc/cpuinfo and post that?
/b
On May 29, 2008, at 10:41 AM, Johny Kadarisman wrote:
Thanks Anthony,
It's a 32bits Ubuntu server version, and I had blindly follow and
run the test with following settings :)
ulimit -c unlimited
ulimit -d unlimited
ulimit -f unlimited
ulimit -i
Thanks Anthony,
It's a 32bits Ubuntu server version, and I had blindly follow and run the
test with following settings :)
ulimit -c unlimited
ulimit -d unlimited
ulimit -f unlimited
ulimit -i unlimited
ulimit -n 99
ulimit -q unlimited
ulimit -u unlimited
ulimit -v unlimited
ulimit -x unlimite
We don't do much testing on the conference but i can give you a few
pointers.
is it a 32 or 64 bit box?
if it's 32 you can try this as root before you start up.
ulimit -s 244
you can also change the conference interval to higher number of ms between
packets to give it more time to mux the audio,
Hi all,
I build a new test boxes for freeswitch. and trying to simulate high load
condition.
I have one freeswitch box that host conference apps, and another box with
simple js to originate call to the conference room.
To monitor the sound quality, I have one phones that dial into the
conference r
20 matches
Mail list logo
