f Of *Anthony
> Minessale
> *Sent:* 13 July 2009 16:59
> *To:* freeswitch-users@lists.freeswitch.org
> *Subject:* Re: [Freeswitch-users] Problems with Ping and re-registering
> brokengateways
>
> Are they ignoring the options packet we send them or are they maybe getting
> lo
They probably shouldn't be responding 484 to them... hrm
/b
On Jul 14, 2009, at 4:07 AM, Andy wrote:
Hi Anthony,
Thanks for your reply. The trace of the ping request looks like
this. Any clues?
send 674 bytes to udp/[77.240.48.94]:5060 at 09:07:25.479313:
Sent: 13 July 2009 16:59
To: freeswitch-users@lists.freeswitch.org
Subject: Re: [Freeswitch-users] Problems with Ping and re-registering
brokengateways
Are they ignoring the options packet we send them or are they maybe getting
lost behind NAT?
we send an OPTIONS and even if we get a error back we
