I am not sure what you mean, do you think that fixes from today should
somehow go somewhere else before we do a release?
On Oct 6, 2009, at 3:21 AM, Vladimir Elizarov wrote:
Brian West пишет:
Because TRUNK is stable... its only fixes going in usually and if
things do break they don't stay
Hello.
I'm trying to configure stun in fs 1.0.4
vars.xml
X-PRE-PROCESS cmd=set data=bind_server_ip=auto/
X-PRE-PROCESS cmd=set data=external_sip_ip=stun:example.com/
X-PRE-PROCESS cmd=set data=external_rtp_ip=stun:example.com/
external.xml
param name=rtp-ip value=$${local_ip_v4}/
param
Yes, the stun thing was fixed after 1.4 I believe.
On Mon, Oct 5, 2009 at 6:43 AM, Vladimir Elizarov
xengelpubl...@gmail.com wrote:
How do I fix this? Upgrade fs to trunk?
--
-Rupa
___
FreeSWITCH-users mailing list
Yes!
/b
On Oct 5, 2009, at 7:43 AM, Vladimir Elizarov wrote:
How do I fix this? Upgrade fs to trunk?
___
FreeSWITCH-users mailing list
FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org
http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
Because TRUNK is stable... its only fixes going in usually and if
things do break they don't stay broken for long.
Ask anyone our trunk is more table then most commercial products.
/b
On Oct 5, 2009, at 12:50 PM, Vladimir Elizarov wrote:
Ok. Brian, why fs no two branches of the stable and
