[Freeswitch-users] trixswitch 0.4

I released the latest version of trixswitch today. Its a fast way to get FreeSWITCH 1.0 running. trixswitch.org ___ Freeswitch-users mailing list Freeswitch-users@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-u

Re: [Freeswitch-users] trixswitch 0.4

is it still using wikipbx? andrew wrote: > I released the latest version of trixswitch today. Its > a fast way to get FreeSWITCH 1.0 running. > > trixswitch.org > > > > > > > > ___ > Freeswitch-users mailing list > Freeswitch-users@lists.freeswitc

Re: [Freeswitch-users] trixswitch 0.4

gt; From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:freeswitch- > [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of andrew > Sent: Tuesday, June 03, 2008 9:41 AM > To: freeswitch-users@lists.freeswitch.org > Subject: Re: [Freeswitch-users] trixswitch 0.4 > > No, it has no GUI at the moment. It's just a fast wa

Re: [Freeswitch-users] trixswitch 0.4

No, it has no GUI at the moment. It's just a fast way to get Linux and FreeSWITCH working. Once we get some development resources we will develop our own GUI based on your url_get stuff. --- Raymond Chandler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > is it still using wikipbx? > > andrew wrote: > > I releas

Re: [Freeswitch-users] trixswitch 0.4

A couple of suggestions: - take a look to nginx, it's really fast and for a fast switch there is need for a fast data backend (it serves data) - dosen't use php (i love php, but it is slow ... a lot slow even using apc, eaccelerator or similar!) Memcached (or similar like sharedance) would be re

Re: [Freeswitch-users] trixswitch 0.4

riginal Message- > > From: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:freeswitch- > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of > andrew > > Sent: Tuesday, June 03, 2008 9:41 AM > > To: freeswitch-users@lists.freeswitch.org > > Subject: Re: [Freeswitch-users] trixswitch 0.4 > >

Re: [Freeswitch-users] trixswitch 0.4

We have a control panel coming up which amongst many other things also manages Asterisk. This would be released as Opensource. It has a PHP front with a Python Agent (for doing sysadmin work). Its plugin based and we would be happy to write a plugin for FS/TrixSwitch in the next coming months!

Re: [Freeswitch-users] trixswitch 0.4

The main problem there is that FreeSwitch can work using xml supplied by a webpage (xml_curl application): this mean that php must supply the XML (from a cache or generated on the fly) The problem is that under an heavy load php isin't a good thing because it eat a lot of resources and kill the

Re: [Freeswitch-users] trixswitch 0.4

CakePHP framework is an excellent choice. This is not your "grandfather" php It include all the DRY development principles and it has built in RESTful support, not "bolt" on. The memcache suggestion is on point -E ___ Freeswitch-users mailing li

Re: [Freeswitch-users] trixswitch 0.4

I'm not saying that php is horrible, i use it, i'm talking only about performances and php is slow nothing more When you need high performances because a lot of requests are done php is not really the best choise. NTOE: CakePHP, like Symphony, are slow ... these aren't the best solutions when

Re: [Freeswitch-users] trixswitch 0.4

Understandand do know that when services/sites are not engineered correctly this will happen. Here is how Flickr have architected their service. Platform PHP MySQL Shards Memcached for a caching layer. Squi

Re: [Freeswitch-users] trixswitch 0.4

Sure, but how many servers them are using? A simply architectural change from Apache/Squid to nginx would let them to serve a lot more requests I'd prefer to look to what them use instead the number of request them can manage: an high number of request means only that the architecture scale wel

Re: [Freeswitch-users] trixswitch 0.4

My initial idea was to use mod_xml_ldap to generate XML from ldap- the panel can control LDAP very efficiently. According to what I have read and saw on this list- this is currently possible. I would imagine that ldap would be far faster than any language with a mysql backend. Albano Daniele S

Re: [Freeswitch-users] trixswitch 0.4

This is sure, it should be a lot faster but a programming language would give a lot of flexibility. Personally i'd like a lot .net/mono (i'm not a microsoft fun but .net, in the lastest releases, is a good thing) because you can really use any language you want (python => ironpython, ruby => ir

Re: [Freeswitch-users] trixswitch 0.4

mod_mono is actually on it's way back to resurrection so stay tuned. Just a warning , don't speculate too much on how much overhead various things have, actually lab it up and find out. =D On Fri, Jun 6, 2008 at 3:21 AM, Albano Daniele Salvatore - Personale < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > This is