Re: [Freeswitch-users] zapata.conf immediate=yes in Asterisk - Freeswitch equivalent?

2009-08-08 Thread Michael Jerris
is this just the timeout waiting for your max digits? On Aug 8, 2009, at 4:58 AM, Merul Patel wrote: > Hi, > > I came across this thread > (http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/2009-January/010172.html > ) from January, and I'm having a similar problem, in that from t

Re: [Freeswitch-users] zapata.conf immediate=yes in Asterisk - Freeswitch equivalent?

2009-08-08 Thread Merul Patel
Hi, I came across this thread (http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/2009-January/010172.html ) from January, and I'm having a similar problem, in that from the moment an incoming analogue call starts ringing, it takes around 5-7 seconds before the dialplan gets executed.

Re: [Freeswitch-users] zapata.conf immediate=yes in Asterisk - Freeswitch equivalent?

2009-01-21 Thread Scott Ellis
Yes and yes, I will get the full details to you next week, snowed under a bit at the moment. Scott Anthony Minessale wrote: did you answer the call in your dialplan? do you have a full debug log of a call with that parameter enabled on the analog span in question? On Thu, Jan 15, 2009

Re: [Freeswitch-users] zapata.conf immediate=yes in Asterisk - Freeswitch equivalent?

2009-01-21 Thread Anthony Minessale
did you answer the call in your dialplan? do you have a full debug log of a call with that parameter enabled on the analog span in question? On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 4:17 AM, Scott Ellis wrote: > After poking around in the code, it looks like if I set name="enable-callerid" value="false"/> in op

Re: [Freeswitch-users] zapata.conf immediate=yes in Asterisk - Freeswitch equivalent - a solution of sorts.

2009-01-15 Thread Anthony Minessale
open a jira and attach a svn diff and we'll have a look thanks On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 5:14 AM, Scott Ellis wrote: > So I decided to hack the code to see if I could just get it to do what I > wanted - assuming some kind of error in the options setting. > > First I changed the state change code t

Re: [Freeswitch-users] zapata.conf immediate=yes in Asterisk - Freeswitch equivalent - a solution of sorts.

2009-01-15 Thread Scott Ellis
So I decided to hack the code to see if I could just get it to do what I wanted - assuming some kind of error in the options setting. First I changed the state change code to just skip straight to IDLE if (!event->channel->ring_count && (event->channel->state == ZAP_CHANNEL_STATE_DOWN && !zap_t

Re: [Freeswitch-users] zapata.conf immediate=yes in Asterisk - Freeswitch equivalent?

2009-01-15 Thread Scott Ellis
After poking around in the code, it looks like if I set in openzap.conf.xml, it should skip the GET_CALLERID state, and I should get the call answered straight away. mod_openzap.c } else if (!strcasecmp(var, "enable-callerid")) { enable_callerid = val; if (zap_configure_s

[Freeswitch-users] zapata.conf immediate=yes in Asterisk - Freeswitch equivalent?

2009-01-14 Thread Scott Ellis
Searched the wiki and mailing lists as best I can, but with no luck. How do I get OpenZap to answer a call immediately? (I do not need caller id) Scott ___ Freeswitch-users mailing list Freeswitch-users@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.or