Re: [Freetel-codec2] How good an oscillator can we get for using narrow channel widths?

2013-06-15 Thread Steve Underwood
On 06/15/2013 09:15 PM, Bruce Perens wrote: > On 6/15/2013 2:44 AM, Steve Underwood wrote: >> How did you get to +-220Hz at 440 from the bunch of error factors in >> that data sheet? > By assuming that we can calibrate out everything that isn't a short-term > variation. > > Thanks > > B

[Freetel-codec2] c2gmsk: API version 20130606: auxiliary data service + migration to LGPL

2013-06-15 Thread Kristoff Bonne
Hi All, I have just commited API version 20130606 to github. 1/ As discussed before, new in this release (compaired to 20130601) is the "auxiliary data service" in the 2400 bps modem. The procedure works like this: * on the sending side: -> the API call "c2gmsk_auxdata_sendmessage" will queue

Re: [Freetel-codec2] How good an oscillator can we get for using narrow channel widths?

2013-06-15 Thread Bruce Perens
On 6/15/2013 2:44 AM, Steve Underwood wrote: > How did you get to +-220Hz at 440 from the bunch of error factors in > that data sheet? By assuming that we can calibrate out everything that isn't a short-term variation. Thanks Bruce -

Re: [Freetel-codec2] How good an oscillator can we get for using narrow channel widths?

2013-06-15 Thread Steve Underwood
On 06/15/2013 06:46 AM, Bruce Perens wrote: > This costs less than $1.50 in 2000 quantity: > http://www.rfm.com/products/data/xtc7006.pdf > If the radio is calibrated, this gets us +-220 Hz at 440. If it's not > calibrated, we could be several kHz off in total. > And this potentially adds 3-6 mW to