Re: [ft-devel] sfnt version 0x00020000UL

2009-10-11 Thread Manlio Perillo
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 George Williams ha scritto: > - Werner LEMBERG wrote: I noted in the FreeType sources (src/sfnt/sfobjs.c) this check on the version parameter: if ( tag != 0x0001UL && tag != TTAG_ttcf&& tag != TTAG_O

Re: [ft-devel] sfnt version 0x00020000UL

2009-10-11 Thread George Williams
- Werner LEMBERG wrote: > > >> I noted in the FreeType sources (src/sfnt/sfobjs.c) this check on the > >> version parameter: > >> > >> if ( tag != 0x0001UL && > >> tag != TTAG_ttcf&& > >> tag != TTAG_OTTO&& > >> tag != TTAG_true&& > >> tag != TTAG_typ1

Re: [ft-devel] sfnt version 0x00020000UL

2009-10-11 Thread mpsuzuki
Hi, If the version is tagged as "CID ", it won't be opened by current freetype2, except of legacy ftmac.c functionalities, I guess. When I've improved sfnt-wrapped CID-keyed font, I could find "CID " table in sfnt resource, but I could not find "CID "-versioned sfnt resource. On Sun, 11 Oct 2009

Re: [ft-devel] sfnt version 0x00020000UL

2009-10-11 Thread Tom Kacvinsky
I recall there being a few fonts from Apple that one could get if they installed a foreign language kit. It was either the Japanese or Korean kit that had these. But these were back in the Mac OS 9 (and earlier) days. On 2009/10/11, at 12:40 , Werner LEMBERG wrote: I noted in the FreeTyp

Re: [ft-devel] sfnt version 0x00020000UL

2009-10-11 Thread Werner LEMBERG
>> I noted in the FreeType sources (src/sfnt/sfobjs.c) this check on the >> version parameter: >> >> if ( tag != 0x0001UL && >> tag != TTAG_ttcf&& >> tag != TTAG_OTTO&& >> tag != TTAG_true&& >> tag != TTAG_typ1&& >> tag != 0x0002UL ) > You can also