>> Great! ... Have you compared with, say, a floating point
>> implementation which returns bboxes with really high precisions?
>
> I anticipated this question.
Hehe :-)
> Why would you compare with theoretical results when your rasterizer
> uses discrete and less accurate bisections? Shouldn'
On Sun, Feb 24, 2013 at 1:08 AM, Werner LEMBERG wrote:
>
> > Attached are more thorough tests. Each line contains bboxes for the
> > the current and proposed algorithms as well as their difference.
> > The bboxes are for two popular fonts at size 24 with rotation of 30
> > degrees as dumped from
