Re: [ft-devel] Prototypes of memory debugging routines on WIN64

2018-09-14 Thread Hin-Tak Leung
On Fri, 14/9/18, Alexei Podtelezhnikov wrote: > > > Indeed, size_t is the correct C89-compliant type. Would it > hurt to > > modify FT_Alloc_Func and > FT_Realloc_Func? > Ping! (with a patch) Thanks. Why are you replacing the negative check with

Re: [ft-devel] Prototypes of memory debugging routines on WIN64

2018-09-14 Thread Alexei Podtelezhnikov
>> - FT_Alloc_Func and FT_Realloc_Func ... need a 64-bit type in the prototype, >> and neither "long" nor "FT_Long" are currently 64-bit on win64. > > Indeed, size_t is the correct C89-compliant type. Would it hurt to > modify FT_Alloc_Func and FT_Realloc_Func? Ping! (with a patch) More work is

Re: [ft-devel] RC

2018-09-14 Thread Alexei Podtelezhnikov
>> > I don't see where that happens in configure source... >> >> LT_PROG_RC >> >> > I have /usr/bin/x86_64-w64-mingw32-windres... >> >> This is a similar issue >> http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/freetype-devel/2018-05/msg00081.html >> worked around by "make RC=''". > > That did it, thanks. > >

Re: [ft-devel] RC

2018-09-14 Thread Behdad Esfahbod
On Fri, Sep 14, 2018 at 5:13 AM, Alexei Podtelezhnikov wrote: > > I don't see where that happens in configure source... > > LT_PROG_RC > > > I have /usr/bin/x86_64-w64-mingw32-windres... > > This is a similar issue > http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/freetype-devel/2018-05/msg00081.html > work