I'll try to get back to this topic soon.
On 15-08-20 03:25 PM, Alexei Podtelezhnikov wrote:
This effect:
https://www.flickr.com/photos/behdad/34769511/
still happens in my limited testing.
This looks like a text layout problem, which was traditionally outside
of FreeType's
This effect:
https://www.flickr.com/photos/behdad/34769511/
still happens in my limited testing.
This looks like a text layout problem, which was traditionally
outside of FreeType's responsibilities.
Hmm. Interesting point of view. I haven't considered that yet.
Doing nothing and
This effect:
https://www.flickr.com/photos/behdad/34769511/
still happens in my limited testing.
This looks like a text layout problem, which was traditionally outside
of FreeType's responsibilities. The extra ink is a result of bitmap
addition, which would be swept under the rug by strong
Folks,
within the next months I'm going to add many scripts to the
auto-hinter (and eventually to ttfautohint), and I will report
progress here so that you can test the forthcoming changes, as
usual :-)
A few weeks ago Behdad pointed out a non-trivial issue in the current
implementation of
I've verified that the vertical position for the joining glyphs are
the same in his font...
I can't reproduce any improvements so far.
This effect:
https://www.flickr.com/photos/behdad/34769511/
still happens in my limited testing.
... and apparently this doesn't work as
Sorry, no. I've only played around with a single font from Titus, but
So, what did you verity at all?
I've verified that the vertical position for the joining glyphs are
the same in his font...
I can't reproduce any improvements so far.
This effect:
On Fri, Aug 07, 2015 at 05:24:17PM +0200, Werner LEMBERG wrote:
I've verified that the vertical position for the joining glyphs are
the same in his font...
I can't reproduce any improvements so far.
This effect:
https://www.flickr.com/photos/behdad/34769511/
still happens in
On 15-08-07 04:16 PM, Werner LEMBERG wrote:
Sorry, no. I've only played around with a single font from Titus, but
So, what did you verity at all?
I've verified that the vertical position for the joining glyphs are
the same in his font...
I can't reproduce any improvements so far.
Per (old?) Microsoft recommendation [1], both approaches are
incorrect.
Yes, very old recommendation, from 2002. Today, this approach is no
longer valid if you use anti-aliasing.
Werner
___
Freetype-devel mailing list
On 15-08-07 05:55 AM, Werner LEMBERG wrote:
Got any screenshots before / after?
Sorry, no. I've only played around with a single font from Titus, but
So, what did you verity at all? I can't reproduce any improvements so far.
This effect:
https://www.flickr.com/photos/behdad/34769511/
That sounds great; Thanks Werner!
Got any screenshots before / after?
Cheers,
behdad
On 15-08-06 07:58 AM, Werner LEMBERG wrote:
Folks,
I've improved auto-hinter support for Arabic (both in FreeType and
ttfautohint). Joining glyphs should now work much better – please
test the git
Folks,
I've improved auto-hinter support for Arabic (both in FreeType and
ttfautohint). Joining glyphs should now work much better – please
test the git repository!
Werner
___
Freetype-devel mailing list
Freetype-devel@nongnu.org
12 matches
Mail list logo