On 12/06/2013 22:34, Werner LEMBERG wrote:
Please test the current git for the next iteration... Werner
Great stuff, Werner - no warnings at all !!
Thanks for all your perseverance,
John
___
Freetype-devel mailing list
Freetype-devel@nongnu.org
Okay, here's my original Buildlog output text (in HTML format).
I've packed it into a zip file this time because the first one was
too big.
Thanks again! I've again disabled MSVC warning C4127 in the git
repository; especially after looking at
On 12/06/2013 10:10, Werner LEMBERG wrote:
I've again disabled MSVC warning C4127 in the git
repository; especially after looking at
https://svn.boost.org/trac/boost/wiki/Guidelines/WarningsGuidelines
I now believe that the original solution of disabling this warning
completely is the
Hi guys,
I noticed that these lines have recently been removed from 'ftdebug.h'
#if defined( _MSC_VER ) /* Visual C++ (and Intel C++) */
/* We disable the warning `conditional expression is
constant' here */
/* in order to compile cleanly with the maximum level
I noticed that these lines have recently been removed from
'ftdebug.h' [...]
Please send me all the warnings. The removal is of temporary nature
only: I'm going to re-add this pragma as soon as I know what it
exactly suppresses (I don't have MSVC).
Werner
On 11/06/2013 11:56, Werner LEMBERG wrote:
Please send me all the warnings. The removal is of temporary nature
only: I'm going to re-add this pragma as soon as I know what it
exactly suppresses (I don't have MSVC).
Hi Werner, I understand. Here's a good example to get you started. I
can
Please send me all the warnings. The removal is of temporary
nature only: I'm going to re-add this pragma as soon as I know what
it exactly suppresses (I don't have MSVC).
Hi Werner, I understand. Here's a good example to get you started.
[...]
Thanks for the explanations! What I
On 11/06/2013 13:08, John Emmas wrote:
#define FT_ASSERT( condition ) \
do\
{ \
if ( !( condition ) ) \
On 11/06/2013 15:14, Robin Watts wrote:
There is a VERY good reason for the while being there. I will try to
explain:
Imagine that you have the following code:
if (x == 0)
FT_ASSERT(some_condition);
else
return 42;
return 23;
Without the while loop, the code would expand
On Tue, Jun 11, 2013, at 03:56 PM, John Emmas wrote:
On 11/06/2013 15:14, Robin Watts wrote:
There is a VERY good reason for the while being there. I will try to
explain:
Imagine that you have the following code:
if (x == 0)
FT_ASSERT(some_condition);
else
10 matches
Mail list logo
