Re: [ft-devel] No support for side-by-side installation of x86-64and i386

2005-12-27 Thread Werner LEMBERG
Just I've searched documents in libtool-1.5.22 2.1a, and libtool mail list archive. In the latest CVS snapshot (2.1a), still multilib support is written as future issue. OK. Anyway, I will ask future plan and advise to libtool list, but I think my patch is sufficient for urgent fix until

Re: [ft-devel] No support for side-by-side installation of x86-64and i386

2005-12-26 Thread Werner LEMBERG
Here's revised version of dual-ABI patch which generates unified ftconfig.h for 64/32bit UNIX platforms. This looks very promising! Thanks for your hard work. AC_ARG_ENABLE([multi-abi], [...] Please put all this stuff into one or more separate files (similar to ft-munmap.m4) to make it

Re: [ft-devel] No support for side-by-side installation of x86-64and i386

2005-12-26 Thread mpsuzuki
On Mon, 26 Dec 2005 11:28:30 +0100 (CET) Werner LEMBERG [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: AC_ARG_ENABLE([multi-abi], [...] Please put all this stuff into one or more separate files (similar to ft-munmap.m4) to make it more comprehensible. Additionally I wonder whether there isn't already some stuff in,

Re: [ft-devel] No support for side-by-side installation of x86-64and i386

2005-12-12 Thread Antoine Leca
[Resend since I did not see the original one. Sorry if it duplicates. ] Hallo Werner, On Thursday, December 8th, 2005 14:37Z, Werner LEMBERG wrote: As far as I've seen, most system headers exist in one copy only, and use preprocessor macros to detect which the architecture is; usually via