On 9/18/20 5:30 AM, David Turner wrote:
Is this also true for pcf.Z and pcf.bz2? I would like to warn about this in
the docs.
Yes, absolutely! Historically, these font files are legacy from X11 and no-one
sane should be using these (there are TrueType equivalents for all of these as
fa
Le ven. 18 sept. 2020 à 14:18, Alexei Podtelezhnikov a
écrit :
>
>
> On Fri, Sep 18, 2020 at 7:18 AM David Turner wrote:
>
>> Le jeu. 17 sept. 2020 à 14:01, Werner LEMBERG a écrit :
>>
>>> > These are some horrible numbers that essentially test FT_Load_Glyph
>>> > from compressed unifont.pcf.gz
On Fri, Sep 18, 2020 at 7:18 AM David Turner wrote:
> Le jeu. 17 sept. 2020 à 14:01, Werner LEMBERG a écrit :
>
>> > These are some horrible numbers that essentially test FT_Load_Glyph
>> > from compressed unifont.pcf.gz in reverse order: [...]
>>
>> We do, there is no "rewinding the compressed
Le jeu. 17 sept. 2020 à 14:01, Werner LEMBERG a écrit :
>
> > These are some horrible numbers that essentially test FT_Load_Glyph
> > from compressed unifont.pcf.gz in reverse order: [...]
> >
> > real0m6.062s
> >
> > The same string forward is much faster: [...]
> >
> > real0m0.486s
>
>
> These are some horrible numbers that essentially test FT_Load_Glyph
> from compressed unifont.pcf.gz in reverse order: [...]
>
> real0m6.062s
>
> The same string forward is much faster: [...]
>
> real0m0.486s
Ouch.
> Is it well known that rewinding the compressed stream is so
> prohib
Hi all,
These are some horrible numbers that essentially test FT_Load_Glyph
from compressed unifont.pcf.gz in reverse order:
$ time bin/ftstring -k3q -mZYXWVUTSRQPONMLKJIHGFEDCBA 15
../unifont-12.0.01.pcf.gz
FreeType String Viewer - press ? for help
Execution completed successfully.
real0m6.
