On Tue, 2005-10-11 at 16:01 -0300, Rob Shortt wrote:
> If would be good if you can add that kind of authentication. I don't
> think encryption here is a big deal, we're talking LAN here.
Ok, I will add it.
> in a situation where I needed encryption I'd use ipsec which is easy to
> set up.
True
On Tue, 2005-10-11 at 13:48 -0400, Jason Tackaberry wrote:
> Probably not a bad idea to do prefetches like that. There's a pretty
> high initial overhead, so it's better to get more rows than you need.
> For example, querying for the next 2 hours of program data takes 0.1
> seconds and returns 200
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jason Tackaberry wrote:
> On Tue, 2005-10-11 at 17:09 +0200, Dirk Meyer wrote:
>
>>We should keep some things in mind. First, your IPC code is nice but
>>not secure. Everyone can connect to the server and call python
>>functions and such things.
>
>
On Tue, 2005-10-11 at 17:09 +0200, Dirk Meyer wrote:
> We should keep some things in mind. First, your IPC code is nice but
> not secure. Everyone can connect to the server and call python
> functions and such things.
I can add authentication. But the data still wouldn't be encrypted, so
in any c
Hi,
here some thoughts about kaa.epg
Jason Tackaberry wrote:
>> I wonder... if we used kaa.vfs in kaa.epg, would it be easier to wrap it
>> up with ipc or mbus? I still have a strong feeling that the EPG should
>> be client / server oriented.
>
> I agree fully that it should be client/server. A
